Bey v. Liza

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3) KENNETH IMHOTEP VAUGHN BEY, Case No.: 2:21-cv-01841-APG-NJK 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation v. [ECF Nos. 1, 3] 6) OCAMPO ANNA LIZA, 7 Defendant 9 On October 5, 2021, Magistrate Judge Koppe recommended that I dismiss plaintiff Kenneth Bey’s complaint as frivolous and delusional. ECF No. 3. Bey did not object. Thus, I not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the 13}|report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna- Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the 15}| magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not 16} otherwise” (emphasis in original)).

17 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Koppe’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 3) is accepted. Plaintiff Kenneth Bey’s complaint (ECF No. 1-1) is dismissed with prejudice and his application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) is denied as 20}|moot. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case.

21 DATED this 27th day of October, 2021. ° ANDREWP.GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE