1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) 10 Plaintiff, ) ) ) 3:12-cr-00051-RCJ-VPC 11 vs. )

) ORDER 12 ADAM SCOTT, ) ) 13 Defendant. ) ) 14 )

15 Defendant was convicted under

(c) for use of a firearm during and in rela- 16 tion to a crime of violence (assault with a dangerous weapon under

(a)(3)). He 17 moved for relief from these convictions pursuant to

, claiming that this conviction 18 is improper under Johnson v. United States,

(2015). In Johnson, the Court inva- 19 lided the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act. At the time of his original motion, the 20 Ninth Circuit held that the Supreme Court has not yet recognized whether Johnson also invalided 21 the residual clause in § 924(c)(3)(B). This Court denied the motion, and Defendant appealed. Dur- 22 ing the course of the appeal, the Supreme Court held that the residual clause under § 924(c)(3)(B) 23 was also unconstitutional in United States v. Davis,

(2019). Defendant therefore 24 filed a renewal of his § 2255 motion based upon Davis. (ECF No. 42.) The Ninth Circuit has since 1 || affirmed the Court’s denial of the underlying motion citing United States v. Gobert,

, 2 || 881 (9th Cir. 2019), where the Ninth Circuit analyzed whether assaults with a dangerous weapon 3 |} under

(a)(3) are crimes of violence under Davis. (ECF No. 40.) Defendant filed a 4 || writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court, which the Court denied. (ECF No. 44.) As the Ninth Circuit 5 || rejected the argument that Defendant seeks to preserve through its renewed motion, this Court 6 || denies the renewal as moot. 7 CONCLUSION 8 || IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence under 28

(ECF No. 42) is DENIED AS MOOT. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 1] Dated November 8, 2021. 12

ROB C. JONES 14 United Stafes District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

DAf9