District Court, D. Nevada, 2021

Allen v. Vocatus, LLC

Allen v. Vocatus, LLC
District Court, D. Nevada · Decided November 12, 2021
Allen v. Vocatus, LLC

Trial Court Opinion

SUZANNE L. MARTIN

Nevada Bar No. 8833 [email protected]

AMY L. HOWARD

Nevada Bar No. 13946 [email protected]

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.

Wells Fargo Tower

Suite 1500

3800 Howard Hughes Parkway

Las Vegas, NV 89169

Telephone: 702.369.6800

Fax: 702.369.6888

Attorneys for Defendants Vocatus, LLC and

Shamoun’s, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

ERIN ALLEN, Case No. 2:21-cv-00377-APG-EJY

Plaintiff,

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO STAY ACTION PENDING vs.

MEDIATION

VOCATUS, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability

Company; SHAMOUN’S, LLC, a Nevada

Limited Liability Company; and DOES and

ROE entities I – X, inclusive,

Defendants.

Pursuant to Local Rules (“LR”) IA 6-2 and LR 7-1, Defendants Vocatus, LLC and Shamoun’s, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) and Plaintiff Erin Allen (“Plaintiff”), by and through undersigned counsel, hereby request and stipulate to stay the entire action in the above-captioned matter pending mediation.

The purpose of the stay is to promote judicial economy and allow this court to more effectively control the disposition of the cases on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and the litigants. See Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (U.S. 1936) (“[T]he power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to control the disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and 1} for litigants.”); Pate v. DePay Orthopedics, Inc., 2012 WL 3532780, at * 2 (D. Nev. Aug. 14, 2} 2012) (“A trial court may, with propriety, find it is efficient for its own docket and the fairest 3} course for the parties to enter a stay of an action before it, pending resolution of independent proceedings which bear upon the case.”), citing Leyva v. Certified Grocers of Cal., Ltd., 593 F.2d 5] 857, 863 (9th Cir. 1979). Plaintiff filed a Motion for Settlement Conference (“Motion”) on October 26, 2021. (ECF No. 18.) Defendants filed a Notice of Non-Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion on November 5, 2021. 8] (ECF No. 19.) The Court granted Plaintiff's Motion on November 8, 2021. (ECF No. 20.) A Settlement Conference is currently set for December 14, 2021. (ECF No. 21.) Should the parties be unsuccessful at resolving this matter, the parties shall meet and confer to prepare an updated 11] Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order to address the remaining limited discovery that needs to be 12] completed, dispositive motions, and pre-trial deadlines. : 13 This Stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purposes of undue burden or delay. 38 14] DATED this 10th day of November, 2021. DATED this 10th day of November, 2021. 15 HATFIELD & ASSOCIATES, LTD. OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. /s/ Trevor J. Hatfield /s/ Amy L. Howard

1g | Trevor J. Hatfield Suzanne L. Martin Nevada Bar No. 7373 Nevada Bar No. 8833

703 S. Eighth Street Amy L. Howard

Las Vegas, NV 89101 Nevada Bar No. 13946

Attorneys for Plaintiff Wells Fargo Tower, Suite 1500 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway

Las Vegas, NV 89169

Attorneys for Defendants

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Ce

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

November 12, 2021

DATE

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.