Bey v. Moser Leland V. & Ineze
Bey v. Moser Leland V. & Ineze
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3 Case No.: 2:21-cv-1840-JAD-VCF 4 Kenneth Imhotep Vaughn Bey,
5 Plaintiff Order Adopting Report & Recommendation 6 and Dismissing Action v. 7 Moser Leland V. & Ineze, 8 [ECF Nos. 1, 3]
9 Defendant 10 11 Plaintiff Kenneth Imhotep Vaughn Bey brings this case against Moser Leland V. & 12 Ineze. The magistrate judge reviewed the complaint (titled as an “Affidavit”), deemed it 13 frivolous and delusional, and issued a report and recommendation to dismiss this case with 14 prejudice.1 The deadline for the plaintiff to object to that recommendation was November 18, 15 2021, and the plaintiff neither filed objections nor moved to extend the deadline to do so. “[N]o 16 review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are 17 filed.”2 Having reviewed the R&R, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do. 18 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and 19 recommendation [ECF No. 3] is ADOPTED in full; 20 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT this case is dismissed with prejudice as frivolous 21 and delusional. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT ACCORDINGLY and 22 CLOSE THIS CASE. The Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [ECF No. 1] is DENIED
23 24 25
26 27 1 ECF No. 3. 28 2 United States v. Reyna-Tapia,
328 F.3d 1114, 1121(9th Cir. 2003). 1 moot. Plaintiff is cautioned that continuing to file frivolous lawsuits may result in adverse 2 || consequences, including possible sanctions or a finding that he is a vexatious litigant. ° SOK 5 Dated: November 24, 2021 6 7 8 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown