Bey v. Moser Leland V. & Ineze
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Case No.: 2:21-cv-1840-JAD-VCF
Kenneth Imhotep Vaughn Bey,
Plaintiff Order Adopting Report & Recommendation and Dismissing Action v. Moser Leland V. & Ineze,
[ECF Nos. 1, 3]
Defendant
Plaintiff Kenneth Imhotep Vaughn Bey brings this case against Moser Leland V. & Ineze. The magistrate judge reviewed the complaint (titled as an “Affidavit”), deemed it frivolous and delusional, and issued a report and recommendation to dismiss this case with prejudice.1 The deadline for the plaintiff to object to that recommendation was November 18, 2021, and the plaintiff neither filed objections nor moved to extend the deadline to do so. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”2 Having reviewed the R&R, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [ECF No. 3] is ADOPTED in full;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT this case is dismissed with prejudice as frivolous and delusional. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT ACCORDINGLY and CLOSE THIS CASE. The Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [ECF No. 1] is DENIED 1 ECF No. 3.
2 United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).
moot. Plaintiff is cautioned that continuing to file frivolous lawsuits may result in adverse consequences, including possible sanctions or a finding that he is a vexatious litigant.
° SOK
Dated: November 24, 2021 1]
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.