Henrickson v. Daniels

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA Case No.: 2:20-cv-01676-JAD-NJK Trent Henrickson, 5 oe Plaintiff Order Adopting Report & 6 Recommendation and Denying Motion v. for Preliminary Injunction g Charles Daniels, et al., [ECF Nos. 23, 31] 9 Defendants 1] The magistrate judge has considered Plaintiff Trent Henrickson’s renewed motion for a || preliminary injunction! and recommends that I deny it because Henrickson has not established || that he will suffer irreparable harm if an injunction does not issue.” The deadline for any party t || object to that recommendation was January 5, 2022, and no party filed anything or asked to || extend the deadline to do so. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and || recommendation unless objections are filed.”*? Having reviewed the R&R, I find good cause to || adopt it, and I do.

18 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and || Recommendation [ECF No. 31] is ADOPTED in its entirety. The renewed motion for || preliminary injunction [ECF No. 23] is DENIED.

U.S. District JudgeJennifetA/ Dorsey 22 Dated: January 10, 2022 || ||! ECF No. 23.

25 |]? ECF No. 31.

26 Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 97 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).