District Court, D. Nevada, 2022

Paredes v. Williams

Paredes v. Williams
District Court, D. Nevada · Decided February 1, 2022
Paredes v. Williams

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA ULISES BENITES PAREDES, Case No. 2:21-cv-02232-RFB-BNW 12 Petitioner, ORDER 13 v. BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, et al., 15 Respondents.

17 This is a habeas corpus action under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 1. The court finds that petitioner is unable to pay the filing fee.

20 Petitioner also has filed a motion for appointment of counsel. ECF No. 2. Petitioner is unable to afford counsel, and his claims would benefit from representation. The court thus grants the motion. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A.

23 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that the application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) is GRANTED. Petitioner need not pay the filing fee of $5.00.

25 IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall file the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

1 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 2) is GRANTED. Counsel will represent the petitioner in all federal proceedings related to this matter, including any appeals or certiorari proceedings, unless allowed to withdraw.

4 IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the Federal Public Defender is appointed provisionally as counsel for petitioner. The Federal Public Defender will have 30 days from the date of entry of this order either to undertake representation of petitioner or to indicate to the court the office's inability to represent petitioner. If the Federal Public Defender is unable to represent petitioner, then the court will appoint alternate counsel, subject again to establishment of financial eligibility.

9 The court will set a deadline for filing of an amended petition or a motion seeking other relief after counsel has appeared. The court does not signify any implied finding of tolling during any time period established or any extension granted. Petitioner always remains responsible for calculating the limitation period of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1) and timely presenting claims. The court makes no representation that the petition, any amendments to the petition, and any claims in the petition or amendments are not subject to dismissal as untimely. See Sossa v. Diaz, 729 F.3d 1225, 1235 (9th Cir. 2013).

16 IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the clerk add Aaron Ford, Attorney General for the State of Nevada, as counsel for respondents.

18 IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that respondents' counsel must enter a notice of appearance within twenty-one (21) days of entry of this order, but no further response will be required from respondents until further order of the court.

21 IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the clerk provide copies of this order and all prior filings to both the Attorney General and the Federal Public Defender in a manner consistent with the clerk's current practice, such as regeneration of notices of electronic filing.

24 /// /// /// /// /// 1 IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that, notwithstanding Local Rule LR IC 2-2(g), paper copies of any electronically filed exhibits need not be provided to chambers or to the staff attorney, unless later directed by the court.

4 DATED: January 31st, 2022 5 ______________________________ RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II 6 United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.