Layton v. Sunbeam Products, Inc.

District Court, D. Nevada

Layton v. Sunbeam Products, Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

1 ALVERSON TAYLOR & SANDERS JONATHAN B. OWENS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7118 2 6605 Grand Montecito Pkwy, Ste. 200 3 Las Vegas, NV 89149 Telephone: 702-384-7000 4 Facsimile: 702-385-7000 [email protected] 5 [email protected] 6 Attorneys for Defendant, Sunbeam Products, Inc. and 7 and Newell Brands Inc.

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 CHRISTINE LAYTON, Civil Action No: 2:21-cv-00989-RFB-BNW 11 Plaintiff, 12 STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) vs. ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY 13 (First Request) 14 SUNBEAM PRODUCTS, INC., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, NEWELL BRANDS, A 15 FOREIGN CORPORATION, DOES 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE and ROE 16 CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE. 17

18 Defendant.

19 COMES NOW Plaintiff CHRISTINE LAYTON and Defendants SUNBEAM 20 PRODUCTS, INC. and NEWELL BRANDS, INC. by and through their respective attorneys of 21 22 record, and herein stipulate, agree and make joint application to extend the discovery period 23 (including all corresponding discovery deadlines) in this matter to June 30, 2022, for the purpose 24 of further discovery, including the depositions of Plaintiff and her medical providers, obtaining 25 further information from Plaintiff about her claimed damages, the requisition of medical and 26 billing records pertaining to Plaintiff’s injuries, and conducting an inspection of the heating pad 27 in question. This is the first stipulation for extension of all discovery deadlines. 1 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff’s claims arise out of an incident that took place on or about April 19, 2019, in 2 3 Clark County, Nevada. Plaintiff allegedly sustained a large second degree burn to her right upper 4 back, while allegedly using a heating pad manufactured by Defendants, resulting in a blister that 5 allegedly required immediate medical attention. Plaintiff filed her Complaint in the District 6 Court of Clark County, Nevada on March 8, 2021. Defendants Sunbeam Products, Inc. and 7 Newell Brands, Inc. removed this matter to the United States District Court of Nevada on May 8 24, 2021. Pursuant to the Discovery Order entered by the Court on September 13, 2021, the last 9 10 day to amend pleadings or add parties is January 28, 2022, initial expert disclosures must be 11 served by February 25, 2022, rebuttal expert disclosures must be served by March 25, 2022, and 12 discovery closes on April 28, 2022. Dispositive motions must be filed no later than May 27, 13 2022, and the Joint Pretrial Order must be filed by June 24, 2022. 14 Due to issues associated with obtaining discovery related to Plaintiff’s claimed damages, 15 claimed injuries, and claimed medical treatment, that further complicated the coordination of 16 deposition dates for Plaintiff and her medical providers, as well as the coordination of expert 17 18 witnesses and an inspection of the allegedly defective heating pad, the parties have agreed to 19 extend all discovery deadlines by 60 days, altering the close of discovery to June 30, 2022. This 20 will allow both Plaintiff and Defendants the opportunity to conduct further discovery, schedule 21 the depositions of Plaintiff and her medical providers, coordinate an inspection of the subject 22 heating pad, and coordinate expert witnesses. 23 II. DISCOVERY COMPLETED TO DATE 24 1. On July 1, 2021, Plaintiff served her Initial Disclosures Pursuant to FRCP 25 26 26(a)(1). 27 / / / / 1 2. On July 13, 2021, Defendants Sunbeam Products, Inc. and Newell Brands, Inc. served their Initial Disclosures Pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(1). 2 3 3. On September 24, 2021, Defendants Sunbeam Products, Inc. and Newell Brands, 4 Inc. served their First Set of Request for Production of Documents and First Set of 5 Interrogatories to Plaintiff. 6 4. On November 9, 2021, Plaintiff served her Responses to Defendants’ First Set of 7 Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents. 8 5. On January 11, 2022, Defendant Sunbeam Products, Inc. and Newell Brands, Inc. 9 10 filed their Motion to Compel Plaintiff’s Responses to Defendants’ Request for Production of 11 Documents. 12 III. DISCOVERY REMAINING 13 1. Deposition of Plaintiff; 14 2. Depositions of Plaintiff’s treating medical providers; 15 3. Depositions noticed by Plaintiff; 16 4. Inspection of Subject Heating Pad; 17 18 5. Initial Expert disclosures; 19 6. Rebuttal Expert disclosures; 20 7. Depositions of all disclosed expert witnesses; and 21 8. Additional written discovery. 22 IV. REASONS WHY DISCOVERY SHOULD BE EXTENDED 23 The close of discovery is set for April 28, 2022, with initial expert witness disclosures set 24 for February 25, 2022, and rebuttal expert disclosures due March 25, 2022. While the parties 25 26 have engaged in the discovery as outline above, the parties need more time to conduct the 27 discovery needed to adequately prepare for expert witness disclosures and the upcoming close of 1 discovery. Specifically, Defendants need more time to obtain Plaintiff’s relevant medical records and bills in order to adequately prepare an expert for initial disclosure, as well as adequately 2 3 prepare and take the deposition of Plaintiff and her treating medical providers. While Plaintiff 4 disclosed medical and billing records from Henderson Hospital and Shadow Emergency 5 Physicians in her initial disclosures and responses to written discovery, she also indicated that 6 she sought additional treatment at Monos Health Institute and Southwest Medical Associates but 7 did not provide additional information regarding the same. Moreover, Defendants need to inspect 8 the subject heating pad, which has been tentatively set for March 23, 2022. The parties also need 9 10 to complete the depositions of any depositions noticed by Plaintiff and her counsel. 11 The parties will not be able to complete these various tasks by the current discovery 12 deadlines due to the continued need of additional medical and billing records from Plaintiff, 13 which have been requested from Plaintiff and have been sought but not yet received by 14 subpoenas issued to Plaintiff’s medical providers by Defendants. 15 Nevada District Court Local Rule 26-3 states that to extend a deadline, the parties must 16 show good cause for the extension. A showing of good cause includes the diligence of the party 17 18 seeking the amendment and “the district court may modify the pretrial schedule if it cannot 19 reasonably be met despite the diligence of the party seeking the extension.” Johnson v. Mammoth 20 Recreations, Inc.,

975 F.2d 604, 609

(9th Cir. 1992). 21 Defendants have diligently sought discovery from Plaintiff, including serving Plaintiff 22 with requests for production of documents and interrogatories on September 24, 2021, to which 23 Plaintiff responded on November 9, 2021. In her responses, Plaintiff indicated that she sought 24 treatment from the four (4) medical providers noted above, but only provided the medical and 25 26 billing records from Henderson Hospital and Shadow Emergency Physicians, stating that the 27 additional medical records and bills from Monos Health Institute and Shadow Emergency 1 Physicians had been requested and would be provided upon receipt. As of the filing of this stipulation, Plaintiff disclosed information from Monos Health Institute, but not information 2 3 from Southwest Medical Associates, and Defendants have yet to receive copies of Plaintiff’s 4 medical and billing records via subpoena. Therefore, the Parties need more time to obtain the 5 relevant medical and billing records in order to adequately prepare for depositions, expert 6 witness disclosures, and the close of discovery. 7 Based on the Parties’ continued efforts to conduct discovery, including obtaining 8 Plaintiff’s medical and billing records (via request to Plaintiff and subpoenas to the providers), 9 10 and conducting written discovery to adequately prepare for the necessary depositions and expert 11 witness disclosures, the parties’ have demonstrated the requisite good cause and attempt to use 12 alternative methods to complete discovery necessary to extend the discovery deadline. For the 13 reasons stated above, the parties respectfully request this Court approve the instant Stipulation 14 and enter its order granting the same. 15 V. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETE DISCOVERY 16 Current: Proposed: 17 18 Last day to conduct all other discovery: April 28, 2022 June 30, 2022

19 Last day to amend pleadings/add parties: January 28, 2022 March 30, 2022

20 Last day to disclose experts: February 25, 2022 April 27, 2022 21 Last day to disclose rebuttal experts: March 25, 2022 May 27, 2022 22 Last day to file dispositive motions: May 27, 2022 July 27, 2022 23 Joint Pre-Trial Order: June 24, 2022 August 26, 2022 24

25 / / / /

26 / / / /

27 / / / / 1 The parties have entered into this Stipulation in an effort to complete discovery an

|| pretrial motions. It is not the intent of the parties to delay the conclusion of this matter. Th 3 || parties wish to obtain any and all necessary information, through formal discovery, to evaluat 4 || this case for further settlement purposes and to prepare the case for trial. No trial date has bee 5 scheduled. Dated this 18" day of January, 2022. Dated this 18" day of January, 2022. ALVERSON TAYLOR & SANDERS RICHARD HARRIS LAW 9 /s/Jonathan B. Owens /s/Christian Miles 10 || JONATHAN B. OWENS, ESQ. CHRISTIAN MILES, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7118 Nevada Bar No. 13193 11 6605 Grand Montecito Pkwy, Ste. 200 801 S 4" St., a Las Vegas, NV 89149 Las Vegas, NV 89101 12 Attorneys for Defendant, Attorneys for Plaintiff

3 13 Sunbeam Products, Inc. and % > g Newell Brands Inc.

|i"! ORDER iT // IT IS SO ORDERED 16 DATED: 2:40 pm, January 31, 2022 ///1 17 1g ||//// Gra Leas Are barn 19 |hy/// BRENDA WEKSLER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 21 ///1 22 ///1 23 ///1 24 a5 26 I//// 27 \V//// 28 6 27220-JBO

Reference

Status
Unknown