1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 kee 6 ROBERTO DURAND, Case No. 3:21-cv-00291-MMD-CSD 7 Plaintiff, ORDER 3 V. LISA M. CLARK, Defendant. 10 11 This matter is referred to the Court for the limited purpose of determining whether 12 || in forma pauperis status should continue on appeal. (ECF No. 21.) The Court certifies that 13 || any in forma pauperis appeal from its dispositive order would be frivolous or would not be 14 || taken “in good faith” pursuant to

(a)(3). Durand’s in forma pauperis status 15 || should thus be revoked on appeal. See Hooker v. American Airlines,

, 1092 16 || (9th Cir. 2002) (finding revocation of in forma pauperis status is appropriate where the 17 || district court finds the appeal to be frivolous). 18 The Clerk of Court is directed to transmit a copy of this order to the Court of Appeals 19 || and then terminate the referral notice (ECF No. 21). 20 DATED THIS 16" Day of March 2022.

22 — MIRANDA M. DU 23 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28