2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA *** 5 COSSACK YC, et al., 6 Case No. 2:22-cv-00132-RFB-VCF Plaintiffs, 7 vs. ORDER TO ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE 8 CFJ AUTOMOTIVE LLC, CASE

9 Defendant.

10 I previously denied pro se plaintiffs Cossack Yc and Davon Leo Townsell’s application to 11 proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). ECF No. 6. I gave plaintiffs until March 14, 2022, to either file the 12 long form IFP applications or to pay the filing fee. Id. I also noted in my order that, “[p]ursuant to LR IA 13 14 3-1, the plaintiff must immediately file written notification with the court of any change of address.” 15 The deadline has passed, and plaintiffs have not paid the filing fee or submitted new IFP applications. 16 The Clerk of Court sent Yc and Townsell copies of my order, which were both returned as 17 undeliverable. See ECF Nos. 7 and 8. Since plaintiff has not commenced this action, I order that this 18 case be administratively closed. 19 ACCORDINGLY, 20 I ORDER that the Clerk of Court is directed to administratively CLOSE this case. 21 NOTICE 22 Pursuant to Local Rules IB 3-1 and IB 3-2, a party may object to orders and reports and 23 recommendations issued by the magistrate judge. Objections must be in writing and filed with the Clerk 24 of the Court within fourteen days. LR IB 3-1, 3-2. The Supreme Court has held that the courts of appeal 25 may determine that an appeal has been waived due to the failure to file objections within the specified time. Thomas v. Arn,

(1985).

5 This circuit has also held that (1) failure to file objections within the specified time and (2) 3 || failure to properly address and brief the objectionable issues waives the right to appeal the District 4 || Court's order and/or appeal factual issues from the order of the District Court. Martinez v. YIst,

|{ 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991); Britt v. Simi Valley United Sch. Dist.,

, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 6 || Pursuant to LR IA 3-1, the plaintiff must immediately file written notification with the court of any 7 || change of address. The notification must include proof of service upon each opposing party’s attorney, 8 Hl or upon the opposing party if the party is unrepresented by counsel. Failure to comply with this rule may ° result in dismissal of the action. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 18th day of March 2022.

13 CaM FERENBACH 14 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25