1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA Lavell Anthony, Case No.: 2:21-cv-02259-JAD-EJY 4 Plaintiff Order Adopting Report and v. Recommendation and Dismissing Case Cardnale Way Acura, [ECF No. 5] 7 Defendant 8 The magistrate judge screened the plaintiff's complaint and recommends that this case be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.' The deadline for the plaintiff to object to that recommendation was January 17, 2022, and no party filed anything or asked to extend the 11} deadline to do so. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation 12|| unless objections are filed.”* Having reviewed the report and recommendation, I find good 13]| cause to adopt it, and I do. 14 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 15|| Recommendation [ECF No. 5] is ADOPTED in its entirety. This case is DISMISSED for lack 16]| of subject matter jurisdiction. If plaintiff wants to pursue this action, he must do so in state The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. (Des As a 19 U.S. Distri¢sIudge J sonia) Dorsey Dated: April 1, 2022 20 21 > 1 ECF No. 5. 2 Schmidt v. Johnstone,

(D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn,

(1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003).