Lujan v. Burger King
Lujan v. Burger King
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA MICHAEL V. LUJAN, Case No.: 2:21-cv-01672-APG-DJA 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation v. [ECF No. 15] BURGER KING, et al., 7 Defendants 8 On March 9, 2022, Magistrate Judge Albregts recommended that I dismiss this case without prejudice because plaintiff Michael Lujan did not file a seconded amended complaint by February 7, 2022 deadline. ECF No. 15. Lujan did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring 12}| district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified 13} proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,
328 F.3d 1114, 1411121(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 16 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Albregts’ report and recommendation 17|| (ECF No. 15) is accepted, and this case is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. 19 DATED this 31st day of March, 2022. 20 OIE a ANDREWP.GORDON. SS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
23
Reference
- Status
- Unknown