Allison v. Stein Forensics Unit

District Court, D. Nevada

Allison v. Stein Forensics Unit

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3) RONALD ALLISON, Case No.: 2:21-cv-01548-APG-EJY 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation v. [ECF No. 5] STEIN FORENSICS UNIT and TIM, 7 Defendants 8 On March 14, 2022, Magistrate Judge Youchah recommended that I dismiss this action 9|| without prejudice because plaintiff Ronald Allison did not pay the filing fee or complete an 10}| application to proceed in forma pauperis and because Allison has not updated his address. ECF 5. Allison did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report recommendation.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is 14! made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the 15}| district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if 16}| objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 17 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Youchah’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 5) is accepted and plaintiff Ronald Allison’s complaint (ECF No. 1-1) is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. 20 DATED this 1st day of April, 2022. 21 UIE ANDREWP.GORDON. SS 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown