Rodney v. Baker
Trial Court Opinion
5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 ok 8 KYLE J. RODNEY, Case No. 3:13-cv-00323-RCJ 9 Petitioner, 40 v. ORDER || WILLIAM GITTERE, et al., 12 Respondents.
Petitioner Kyle J. Rodney, through counsel, moves this Court for the entry of an order "° extending the time within which he must file his reply brief on the issue of cause and prejudice "° under Martinez v. Ryan, 566 U.S. 1 (2012), and the merits of his claims of ineffective assistance " of trial counsel. The brief is currently due on March 10, 2022. Mr. Rodney requests a 46-day ° extension, up to and including Monday, April 25, 2022. Respondents do not object to this "° request for an extension.
Rodney has established good cause for the extension.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the unopposed motion for extension of time (ECF No. 91) is GRANTED.
DATED THIS 4" day of April, 2022.
26 ok D DISTRICT JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.