Griggs v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
Griggs v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 * * *
9 NICOLE DENISE GRIGGS, Case No. 2:21-cv-02117-RFB-EJY
10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v.
12
13 LAS VEGAS METRO POLICE DEPARTMENT, 14 Defendant. 15 16 Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 3] of the 17 Honorable Elayna J. Youchah, United States Magistrate Judge, entered December 6, 2021. 18 A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or 19 recommendations made by the magistrate.”
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific 20 written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge.
28 U.S.C. § 21636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is 22 required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed 23 findings or recommendations to which objection is made.”
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local 24 Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct 25 “any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 26 Thomas v. Arn,
474 U.S. 140, 149(1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due 27 by December 20, 2021. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this 28 case and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations. 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 3] is 2 mooted by Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 5]. 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 5] is 4 ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full [ECF No. 5]. 5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment claims asserted in her 6 Amended Complaint [ECF No. 4] be dismissed with prejudice as her claims are time barred. 7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s substantive due process claims for denial of 8 a driver’s license by the State of Florida be dismissed with prejudice as failing to state a claim 9 upon which relief may be granted. 10 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case be closed by the Clerk of Court and judgment 11 entered in favor of Defendants.
12
13 DATED: April 4, 2022. _____________________________ 14 RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II 15 United States District Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown