1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 * * *

9 JONATHAN MUNOZ and RAQUEL Case No. 2:21-cv-01297-RFB-EJY MUNOZ, 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12

13 INCEPTION, LLC and NATERA, INC.,

14 Defendants.

15 Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 4 & 7] of 16 the Honorable Elayna J. Youchah, United States Magistrate Judge, entered September 2, 2021 and 17 November 1, 2021. 18 A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or 19 recommendations made by the magistrate.”

(b)(1). A party may file specific 20 written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge.

636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is 22 required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed 23 findings or recommendations to which objection is made.”

(b)(1); see also Local 24 Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct 25 “any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 26 Thomas v. Arn,

(1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due 27 by September 16, 2021 and November 15, 2021. No objections have been filed. The Court has 28 reviewed the record in this case and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations. 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 4 & 7] 2} are ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Amended Complaint [ECF No. 6] 1s 4| dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff may proceed against Defendants in the Eighth Judicial 5 | District Court for Clark County, Nevada. 6 4 < 7 DATED: April 4, 2022. 8 RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II 9 United States District Judge 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

-2-