1 || ROBERT T. EGLET, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 3402 2 || TRACY A. EGLET, ESQ. 3 Nevada Bar No. 6419 DANIELLE C. MILLER, ESQ. 4 Nevada Bar No. 9127 EGLET ADAMS 5 ||

Street, #400 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 6 || Tel.: 702-450-5400 Fax: 702-450-5451 7 || [email protected] -and- 8 || DAVID A. CARROLL, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7643 9 || ANTHONY J. DIRAIMONDO, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 10875 10 |] RICE REUTHER SULLIVAN & CARROLL, LLP 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1200 11 || Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 D Attorneys for Plaintiff a 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 13 || SOMERSET AT SAHARA, LLC, a Nevada | Case No. 2:22-cv-00486-JCM-NJK. fm 16 limited liability company; 17 Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE UO 18 || vs.

19 || COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL NORTH 0 TEXAS, LLC, a Texas limited liability company; ROBERT M. ACUFF, an 21 || individual; THOMAS L. SUTHERLAND, an individual; COLLIERS NEVADA, LLC, a 22 || Nevada limited liability company; STEVE 3 EVERBACH, an individual; HEALTHMEDICA, INC., a _ California 24 || corporation; UNIFUND, INC., a California corporation; SAN FRANCISCO MEDICAL 25 INSTITUTE, INC., a California corporation; 26 NATHAN SASSOVER, an __ individual; FLOORESCENCE, INC., a California 27 || corporation; DOE INDIVIDUALS 1 through 40; DOE EMPLOYEES 1 through 40; DOE 28 || COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE BROKERS

1 || 1 through 40; and ROE CORPORATIONS 1 through 40; DOE NEGLIGENT 2 ||EMPLOYERS 1 through 40; DOE 3 || NEGLIGENT EMPLOYEES 1 through 40; ROE NEGLIGENT COMMERCIAL REAL 4 || ESTATE BROKERS 1 through 40, 5 Defendants. 7 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE 8 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff SOMERSET AT □□□□□□ 9 || LLC, by and through its attorneys of record, EGLET ADAMS and RICE REUTHER SULLIVA 10 || & CARROLL, LLP; and Defendants COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL NORTH TEXAS, LL‘ 11 |} ROBERT M. ACUFF, THOMAS L. SUTHERLAND, COLLIERS NEVADA, LLC, and STEV 12 || EVERBACH, by through their attorneys of record, LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRIST! 13 |] LLP and MUNSCH HARDT KOPF & HARR, P.C. that: << 14 The due date for Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants Colliers International North Texa 15 || LLC, Robert M. Acuff, Thomas L. Sutherland, and Colliers Nevada, LLC’s Rule 12(b)(6) Motic 16 || to Dismiss [ECF No. 9], and the due date for Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendant Steve Everbach 17 || Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and for Failure to Sta 18 || A Claim Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) and (6) [ECF NO. 10], shall t 19 || extended from April 7, 2022 to April 28, 2022; and 20 Defendants’ Responses to Plaintiff's Oppositions shall be extended from April 14, 202 21 || to May 12, 2022. 22 This request for an extension of time is not sought for any improper purpose or for □□□□□□ 23 || of delay and is based upon the following: Plaintiffs counsel initiated this request because couns 24 || has been occupied preparing numerous Replies to Motions in Limine and Oppositions to Motiot 25 || in Limine in a catastrophic personal injury matter currently pending in the Eighth Judicial Distri 26 || Court entitled Ethan Ferree y. Sin City Tours, et al. Case No. A-18-774286-C. Plaintiff has al: 27 ||been occupied preparing for an Evidentiary Hearing in another a catastrophic personal inju 28 || matter currently pending in the Eighth Judicial District Court entitled Jeff Merlino v. Signal But

1 || Investors, LLC, et al. Case No. A-18-769300-C. Defendants’ counsel will also be in a two (2) wee 2 || trial that is scheduled to begin on April 25, 2022. This is Plaintiff's counsel and Defendant 3 || counsel’s first request to extend these deadlines, which is made in good faith and not for purpos 4 || of delay. 5 WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that the Court extend the time for Plainti 6 || to file its Oppositions to Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss to April 28, 2022, and that the Cou 7 || extend the time for Defendants’ Responses to Plaintiff's Oppositions to May 12, 2022. 8 ||DATED this 7th day of April, 2022. DATED this 7th day of April, 2022. 9 ||EGLET ADAMS LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LL 10 /s/ Tracy A. Eglet, Esq. /s/ Greg C. Noschese, Esq. 11 |/ROBERT T. EGLET, ESQ. DANIEL F. POLSENBERG, ESQ. D Nevada Bar No. 3402 Nevada Bar No. 2376 TRACY A. EGLET, ESQ. DAN R. WAITE, ESQ. Q 13 Nevada Bar No. 6419 Nevada Bar No. 4078 < DANIELLE C. MILLER, ESQ. 3993 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 600 14 Nevada Bar No. 9127 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 400 South 7th Street, 4 Floor -and- 15 ||Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 GREG C. NOSCHESE, ESQ. -and- Texas Bar No. 797164 16 || David A. Carroll, Esq. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) [Le Nevada Bar No. 7643 NATALIE A. SEARS, ESQ. je] «(1:7 *|| Anthony J. DiRaimondo, Esq. Texas Bar No. 24098400 0 Nevada Bar No. 10875 (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 18 || RICE REUTHER SULLIVAN & MUNSCH HARDT KOPF & HARR, PC Pele CARROLL, LLP 500 N. Akard Street, Suite 3800 19 || 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1200 Dallas, TX 75201 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Attorneys for Defendants Colliers International Nor 20 || Attorneys for Plaintiff Texas, LLC, Robert M. Acuff, Thomas Lee □□□□□□□□□ □ and Case Commercial Real Estate Partners, LLC 22 ORDER 23 Based upon the Parties’ Stipulation and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT | 24 || SO ORDERED: 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. . 26 Pdiid ©. “Calla 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 DATED: April 8, 2022