Polymer80, Inc. v. Glock, Inc., a foreign corporation
Polymer80, Inc. v. Glock, Inc., a foreign corporation
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 kee 4 POLYMER8Q(, INC., Case No. 3:20-CV-00617-MMD-CLB 5 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL 6 V. AND MOTION TO SEAL GLOCK, INC., et al, [ECF Nos. 73, 74] 8 Defendants. 9 10 The law firm of Ferdinand IP, LLC d/b/a Ferdinand IP Law Group and individual 11 | attorneys Edmund J. Ferdinand, Ill, Esq., Jonn Olsen, Esq., and Alexander Malbin, Esq. 12 | filed a motion to withdraw as counsel. (ECF No. 73.) No opposition was filed. Therefore, the motion to withdraw as counsel is GRANTED. (/d.) The motion to seal the 14 | memorandum and declaration associated with this motion, (ECF No. 74), is GRANTED. 15 At this time the Gunderson Law Firm, John Funk, Esq., and Luke Walker, Esq. 16 | continue as counsel of record for Polymer80, Inc. although their motion to withdraw as 17 | counsel has been filed and is in the briefing cycle. (ECF No. 76.) 18 Polymer80, Inc. is advised that the Ninth Circuit has held that a corporation and 19 | other unincorporated associations may only appear in federal court through an attorney. United States v. High Country Broadcasting Co., Inc.,
3 F.3d 1244(9th Cir. 1993); Licht 21 v. America West Airlines,
40 F.3d 1058(9th Cir. 1994). 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 DATED: April 15, 2022 . ‘
24 UNITED STAT GISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown