Douglas-McClain v. Hua
Douglas-McClain v. Hua
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA SEAN EDWARD DOUGLAS-MCCLAIN, Case No.: 2:22-cv-00227-APG-VCF 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation v. [ECF No. 4] JUDGE JEANNIE HUA and JUDGE SUSAN BAUCUM, 7 Defendants 8 9 On April 13, 2022, Magistrate Judge Ferenbach recommended that I dismiss this case because plaintiff Sean Douglas-McClain did not pay the filing fee or submit an application to 11}| proceed in forma pauperis by the March 24, 2022 deadline. ECF No. 4. Douglas-McClain did 12||not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and 13} }recommendation.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo 14|| determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is 15}|made”’); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,
328 F.3d 1114, 1121(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 18 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Ferenbach’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 4) is accepted and this case is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. 21 DATED this 30th day of April, 2022. 22 23 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown