Blandburg v. Advanced Lighting and Electric, Inc.

6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 * * * RASHAUD BLANDBURG, Case No. 2:19-cv-01519-RFB-BNW 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. ADVANCED LIGHTING AND ELECTRIC, INC., Defendant.

Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 64] of the Honorable Brenda Weksler, United States Magistrate Judge, entered February 24, 2022.

A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 20 636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct “any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge.

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due by March 14, 2022. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this case and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations. . . .

1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 64] is | ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.

3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that ECF No. 59 is GRANTED in part consistent with this 4} Order.

DATED: May 5, 2022. AK 7 RICHARD ¥F. BOULWARE, II g United States District Judge -2-