In re Patricia Garcia
Trial Court Opinion
3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 RE PATRICIA GARCIA, Case No.: 2:22-cv-00084-JAD-NJK Plaintiff, 7 ORDER 9 On January 14, 2022, Plaintiff filed documents to initiate this case. Docket No. 1. On May 10] 5, 2022, the Court found that Plaintiff had failed to include basic required information in her 11} initiating documents and ordered her to file a proper complaint no later than June 6, 2022. Docket 12} No. 2.
13 On May 16, 2022, the Court’s order was returned to the Court as undeliverable at the 14] address Plaintiff provided. Docket No. 3. “A party, not the district court, bears the burden of 15] keeping the court apprised of any changes in [her] mailing address.” Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 16] 1441 (9th Cir. 1988) (per curiam); see also In re Hammer, 940 F.2d 524, 526 (9th Cir. 1991). To 17] that end, the local rules require that litigants immediately file with the Court written notification 18]| of any change of address, and expressly warn that failure to do so may result in case-dispositive 19] sanctions. See Local Rule IA 3-1.
20 Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a notice of changed address no later 21] than June 28, 2022. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN 22|| DISMISSAL OF THIS CASE.
23 IT IS SO ORDERED.
24 Dated: June 7, 2022.
25 oy 6 fo A SS = = a 27 NAY OKORS AGISTRATE JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.