1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3 RUBEN MATADAMOS-SERRANO, ) 4 ) Plaintiff, ) Case No.: 2:22-cv-00757-GMN-NJK 5 vs. ) 6 ) ORDER CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC DEF., ) 7 ) Defendant. ) 8 ) 9 Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States 10 Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe, (ECF No. 8), which recommends that the case be dismissed 11 without prejudice. 12 A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a 13 United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4.

(b)(1)(B); 14 D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo 15 determination of those portions to which objections are made.

The Court may accept, reject, 16 or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. 17

(b)(1); D. Nev. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is 18 not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an 19 objection.” Thomas v. Arn,

(1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized 20 that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation 21 where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna–Tapia,

, 22 1122 (9th Cir. 2003). 23 Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so, July 13, 2022, has passed. (See 24 Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 8). 25 Accordingly, 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 8), is 2 ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED in full. 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, 4 (ECF No. 1), is DENIED as moot. 5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED without prejudice. 6 The Clerk of Court shall close the case accordingly. 7 DATED this __1_8__ day of July, 2022. 8 9 10 ___________________________________ Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge 11 United States District Court 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25