1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA RYAN KENNETH RANDALL, Case No.: 2:22-cv-00807-APG-NJK 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation v. [ECF No. 8] CITY OF LAS VEGAS, 7 Defendant 8 On June 29, 2022, Magistrate Judge Koppe recommended that I dismiss this case without 9|| prejudice because plaintiff Ryan Randall did not pay the filing few or file a renewed application 10}| for leave to proceed in forma pauperis by June 22, 2022 as ordered. ECF No. 8. Randall did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those 13} portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review 15}|the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not 16} otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 17 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Koppe’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 8) is accepted, and this case is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. 20 DATED this 19th day of July, 2022. 21 (IER ANDREWP.GORDON. SS 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE