2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 KK OK 9 RONALD J. ALLISON, Case No. 2:22-cv-00994-RFB-NJK 10 Plaintiff, 1 ORDER | MIKE VANLUVEN, 13 Defendants. 14 15 Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 4] of the 16 | Honorable Nancy J. Koppe, United States Magistrate Judge, entered August 1, 2022. 17 A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or 18 | recommendations made by the magistrate.”

(b)(1). A party may file specific 19 | written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge.

| 636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed the district court is 21 | required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed 22 | findings or recommendations to which objection is made.”

(b)(1); see also Local 23) Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct “any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 25 | Thomas v. Arn,

(1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due 26 | by August 15, 2022. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this case 27 | and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations. 28) ...

1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 4] is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. 4 The Court Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff. 5 6 DATED: September 2, 2022. M2 AS g RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II 9 United States District Judge

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

_2-