Taylor v. Correctional Officer G. Santos

District Court, D. Nevada

Taylor v. Correctional Officer G. Santos

Trial Court Opinion

2

3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 *** RAYMOND D. TAYLOR, JR., 8 Case No. 2:22-cv-01394-APG-VCF Plaintiff, 9 vs. ORDER 10 CORRECTIONAL OFFICER G. SANTOS, APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 11 Defendant. (EFC NO. 1)

12

Pro se plaintiff Raymond D. Taylor, Jr. filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF 13 14 No. 1) and complaint (ECF No. 1-1). I deny Taylor’s in forma pauperis application without prejudice. 15 DISCUSSION 16 Under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(1), a plaintiff may bring a civil action “without prepayment of fees or 17 security thereof” if the plaintiff submits a financial affidavit that demonstrates the plaintiff “is unable to 18 pay such fees or give security therefor.” If the plaintiff is a "prisoner" as defined by

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(h), 19 as amended by the Prison Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA"), he remains obligated to pay the entire fee in 20 installments, regardless of whether his action is ultimately dismissed. See

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(b)(1) & (2); 21 Taylor v. Delatoore,

281 F.3d 844, 847

(9th Cir. 2002). 22 Under the PLRA, a prisoner seeking leave to proceed IFP must submit a "certified copy of the 23 trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the prisoner for the six-month period 24 25 immediately preceding the filing of the complaint."

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(2); Andrews v. King,

398 F.3d 1113, 1119

(9th Cir. 2005). From the certified trust account statement, the Court must assess an initial payment of 20% of (a) the average monthly deposits in the account for the past six months, or (b) the 1 average monthly balance in the account for the past six months, whichever is greater, unless the prisoner 2 has no assets. See

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(b)(1);

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(b)(4). The institution having custody of the 3 4 prisoner must collect subsequent payments, assessed at 20% of the preceding month's income, in any 5 month in which the prisoner's account exceeds $10, and forward those payments to the Court until the 6 entire filing fee is paid. See

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(b)(2). 7 Plaintiff is currently incarcerated. ECF No. 1 at 4. Plaintiff filed an affidavit, but he did not sign 8 the declaration under penalty of perjury.

Id. at 3

. Plaintiff also did not file a certified copy of the trust 9 fund account statement. Plaintiffs’ application to proceed in forma pauperis is denied without prejudice. 10 Since I deny plaintiff’s IFP application, I do not screen his complaint now. 11 ACCORDINGLY, 12 I ORDER that plaintiff Taylor’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) is 13 DENIED without prejudice. 14 I FURTHER ORDER that by Wednesday, October 19, 2022, plaintiff must either (1) sign the 15 declaration under penalty of perjury on a new IFP application and submit a certified copy of the trust 16 17 fund account or (2) plaintiff must pay the full fee for filing a civil action. 18 NOTICE 19 Pursuant to Local Rules IB 3-1 and IB 3-2, a party may object to orders and reports and 20 recommendations issued by the magistrate judge. Objections must be in writing and filed with the Clerk 21 of the Court within fourteen days. LR IB 3-1, 3-2. The Supreme Court has held that the courts of appeal 22 may determine that an appeal has been waived due to the failure to file objections within the specified 23 time. Thomas v. Arn,

474 U.S. 140, 142

(1985). This circuit has also held that (1) failure to file 24 objections within the specified time and (2) failure to properly address and brief the objectionable issues 25 2 waives the right to appeal the District Court's order and/or appeal factual issues from the order of the

5 District Court. Martinez v. YIst,

951 F.2d 1153, 1157

(9th Cir. 1991); Britt v. Simi Valley United Sch.

3 Dist.,

708 F.2d 452

, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Pursuant to LR IA 3-1, plaintiffs must immediately file written 4 || notification with the court of any change of address. The notification must include proof of service upon 5 || each opposing party’s attorney, or upon the opposing party if the party is unrepresented by counsel. 6 || Failure to comply with this rule may result in dismissal of the action. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 DATED this 19" day of September 2022. 9 Load 10 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Reference

Status
Unknown