1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA ANDREW L. MEEKS, Case No.: 2:19-cv-01352-APG-BNW 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case v. [ECF No. 35] HAROLD WICKHAM, et al., 7 Defendants 8 On September 1, 2022, Magistrate Judge Weksler recommended that I dismiss this case 9|| because plaintiff Andrew Meeks has not updated his address with the court despite being ordered do so. ECF No. 35. Meeks did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo 11}|review of the report and recommendation.

(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) 141 (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations 15}| de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 16 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Weksler’s report and recommendation 17) (ECF No. 35) is accepted and this case is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. 19 DATED this 21st day of September, 2022. 20 OIE a ANDREWP.GORDON. SS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

23