1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 PARNELL COLVIN, et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-02109-RFB-NJK 8 Plaintiff(s), Order ov. [Docket Nos. 21, 24] 10) TOMMY WHITE, et al., 11 Defendant(s). 12 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to stay discovery pending resolution of 13] the motion to dismiss. Docket No. 21. No response was filed.! Also pending before the Court is 14] a proposed discovery plan. Docket No. 24. Having considered the applicable standards, see, e.g., Kor Media Group, LLC v. Green,

(D. Nev. 2013), the Court finds that a stay 16] of discovery is warranted here. Accordingly, the motion to stay discovery (Docket No. 21) is GRANTED and the discovery plan (Docket No. 24) is DENIED as moot. In the event resolution 18] of the motion to dismiss does not result in the termination of this case, the parties must file a status 19] report or discovery plan within 14 days of the issuance of such order. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: October 17, 2022 .

Nancy J.Koppe 23 United States Magistrate Judge 24 25 26 27 ' The underlying motion to dismiss has been fully briefed. Docket Nos. 20 (motion), 34 || (response), and 36 (reply). The Court liberally construes the filings of pro se litigants. Erickson v. Pardus,

(2007).