Smith v. BulkSupplements.com

District Court, D. Nevada

Smith v. BulkSupplements.com

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA CHARMANE SMITH, Case No.: 2:22-cv-00600-APG-DJA 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case v. [ECF No. 9] BULKSUPPLEMENTS.COM and KEVIN BARONOWSKY, 7 Defendants 8 9 On September 30, 2022, Magistrate Judge Albregts recommended that I dismiss this case 10}| because plaintiff Charmane Smith did not file an amended complaint by the given deadline. ECF 9. Smith did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report recommendation.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo 13} determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is 14! made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the 15}| district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if 16}| objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 17 I THEREFORE ORDER that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The clerk of 18} court is instructed to close this case. 19 DATED this 20th day of October, 2022. ge— 21 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

23

Reference

Status
Unknown