Xing v. USA Good Travel and Tour Inc.

ty yemre ue ape ye) sm EE Hee pou. shiz Mei Tour and Travel 2:20-cy- O-cy 01593-JCM-BNWy DEAR: JUDGES Due to the covid pandemic, the traveling business was not running well. As the owner of USA Good Travel and Tour, | am still paying the SBA loan. The company is not able to afford attorneys, so | would like to represent myself for this case — pro se. | am requesting an English interpreter for the language barrier.

In addition, Ziheng Xing received all legal and legitimate payrolls. | will provide the evidence from my CPA.

Thanks, Kongming Yan TOUR AND TRAVEL 11/08/2022 ORDER Court has reviewed Defendant's Motion for Interpreter (filed at ECF No. 27).

USA Good Travel and Tour Inc. seeks to have its owner represent the company pro se. But, as the Court □ advised Defendant, a corporation cannot represent itself. See In re Am. W. Airlines, 40 F.3d 1058, 1059 (Q 1994) (holding that “[c]orporations and other unincorporated associations must appear in court through an attorn Defendant must obtain counsel. The Court has provided Defendant multiple extensions to locate an □□□□ is advised that the Court will provide it with one final extension to locate an attorney. IT IS THEREFOR that Defendant USA Good Travel and Tour Inc. shall have until December 18, 2022 to retain counsel a file a notice of appearance. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation to the Dis that a default be entered against Defendant USA Good Travel and Tour Inc. also seeks the Court to appoint it an interpreter but does not cite to any authority which allows a District C counsel in a civil action. Defendant has so far demonstrated its proficiency to communicate in written Eng absent specific authorization to appoint an interpreter, and because there are no proceedings scheduled | to be scheduled in the near future which would require Defendant to communicate in a manner other than in □□ denies Defendant's motion in this respect as well.

THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Interpreter (ECF No. 27) is DENIED without prejudi IT IS SO ORDERED DATED: 5:03 pm, November 18, 2022 Log la wen BRENDA WEKSLER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1} es CE —— i “ © on m OE wa < 3 Pee Pos 6 = SE yuo RK & oS Eee oF □□ i ae Pe o Ske = SS Te Om A 2 s = OE \—~ +4 oO @ 3S > uu Ry wy NO © = □□ ————— ee QP - a rm □ ; ae rm ae % 2 —— > Y - | | > i 1 | om FF SS | oe oe eC Be B |S | ( ey: cn 3 □ □ “ oes, 22| | | ye eo) NOB o> i oe HF) ey os q wh Be P2286 4 | = ys A ree° © yn a = RERSS 33] = Ss rgagsTy □□ 8 2. = eS £ mg r | □ | = = oO Hn = <= & =: GJ m\ > << = ™m > OS F&F | = SF Ys a Sy DES =. emennen, ‘ > □ x >= mg a | 5 g i EB —~ fr me EB face a 2 0 ae nk