Hood v. Well Path
Trial Court Opinion
5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA JIM EDWARD HOOD, 8 Case No. 2:22-cv-00323-RFB-NJK Plaintiff, 9 ORDER 10 [Docket No. 7] ||| WELL PATH. etal.
Defendants.
13 Plaintiff has failed to update his address. See Docket No. 7. “A party, not the district court, 14! bears the burden of keeping the court apprised of any changes in his mailing address.” Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1441 (9th Cir. 1988): see also In re Hammer, 940 F.2d 524, 526 (9th Cir. 16] 1991). To that end, the local rules require that litigants immediately file with the Court written notification of any change of address, and expressly wam that failure to do so may result in case- 18} dispositive sanctions. See Local Rule IA 3-1.
19 Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a notice of changed address by 20] December 22, 2022. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN 21! DISMISSAL OF THIS CASE.
22 IT IS SO ORDERED.
23 Dated: December 2, 2022 24 C\)\ Ao.
25 Nancy J.K6éppe United States\Magistrate Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.