Johnson v. Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
Johnson v. Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 KEVIN JOHNSON, 8 Case No. 2:22-cv-01697-JCM-NJK Plaintiff(s), 9 Order v. 10 [Docket No. 7] WILLIAM HILL HOLDINGS LIMITED, et al., 12 Defendant(s). 13 Pending before the Court is a motion to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff, Docket No. 7, as 14] well as a supplement thereto, Docket No. 10. No response has been filed. For good cause shown, 15] the motion to withdraw is GRANTED.! The Clerk’s Office is INSTRUCTED to update the 16]| docket to reflect Plaintiff's address as stated at Docket No. 7 at 2. 17 Plaintiff is advised that he must familiarize himself with the Federal Rules of Civil 18] Procedure and the local rules of this Court, as he must comply with these rules despite his lack of 19] counsel. E.g., King v. Atiyeh,
814 F.2d 565, 567(9th Cir. 1987), overruled on other grounds by 20|| Lacey v. Maricopa Cnty.,
693 F.3d 896(9th Cir. 2012). Failure to do so may result in the 21] imposition of sanctions. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: February 22, 2023 ,
Nancy J. Koppe 25 United States Magistrate Judge 26 27 ' Within this motion is a request to extend the service deadline. See Docket No. 7 at 5; but see Local Rule IC 2-2(b) (separate documents must be filed for separate requests). It appears that 28] issue is now moot. See Docket No. 10 at ¥ 5 (citing Docket No. 6).
Reference
- Status
- Unknown