District Court, D. Nevada, 2023

Campagna v. Arroweye Solutions, Inc.

Campagna v. Arroweye Solutions, Inc.
District Court, D. Nevada · Decided March 21, 2023
Campagna v. Arroweye Solutions, Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

1 LINH T. HUA, ESQ. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) DIONE C. WRENN, ESQ.

Nevada Bar No. 13285 GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP 300 South 4th Street, Suite 1550 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: (702) 577-9300 Facsimile: (702) 255-2858 E-Mail: [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Arroweye Solutions, Inc. and Mica Moseley UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA JENNIFER CAMPAGNA, an individual, Case No.: 2:21-cv-00581-JCM-VCF 13 Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO vs. EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS ARROWEYE SOLUTIONS, INC., a Delaware ARROWEYE SOLUTIONS, INC. corporation; MICA MOSELEY, an individual; AND MICA MOSELEY’S MOTION DOES I through X, inclusive; and ROE BUSINESS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ENTITIES, I through X, inclusive, 17 (FIRST REQUEST) Defendants.

Defendants ARROWEYE SOLUTIONS, INC. (“Arroweye”) and MICA MOSELEY (“Moseley”) (collectively, “Defendants”), by and through their attorneys, Linh T. Hua, Esq. and Dione C. Wrenn, Esq. of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani LLP, and Plaintiff JENNIFER CAMPAGNA (“Plaintiff”), by and through her attorney, Jill Garcia, Esq. of Hone Law, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. Defendants filed their Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”) on January 17, 2023 [ECF No. 66].

1 2. On March 7, 2023, Plaintiff filed an opposition to Defendants’ Motion [ECF No. || 73]. By way of stipulation, the parties agreed to the deadline on which Plaintiff filed her || opposition. See ECF Nos. 67, 69, and 70.

4 3. The current deadline for Defendants to file their reply in support of the Motion is || March 21, 2023.

6 4. Defendants request additional time, up to and including April 4, 2023 (2 weeks), || to file their reply to the Motion.

8 5. This is Defendants’ first request for extension of the reply deadline, and it is not || intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.

10 6. Plaintiff does not oppose Defendants’ requested extension.

3 11 7. Accordingly, Defendants will file their reply in support of the Motion on April 4, 2% _ 12 ||2023.

a 13 8. This is the first request for said extension and is not made for purposes of delay. =5¢ 14 ||IT ISSO STIPULATED. ace gt 4 DATED this 21st. day of March, 2023. DATED this 21st. day of March, 2023.

5“ 6 5 GORDON REES SCULLY HONE LAW MANSUKHANI Js/Dione @. Wrenn A Sil Garcia || LINH HUA, ESQ. JILL GARCIA, ESQ. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Nevada Bar No. 7805 || DIONE C. WRENN, ESQ. 701 N. Green Valley Parkway, Suite 200 Nevada Bar No. 13285 Henderson, Nevada 89074 300 South 4" Street, Suite 1550 Attorney for Plaintiff, || Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Jennifer Campagna Attorneys for Defendants, || Arroweye Solutions, Inc. and Mica Moseley 24 IT IS SO ORDERED.

25 Bttus ©. Malan 26 (UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE DATED: March 21, 2023 -2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.