1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * *

7 YARITZ HERNANDEZ, Case No. 2:19-CV-1528 JCM (DJA)

8 Plaintiff(s), ORDER

9 v.

10 CHARLIE TABILANGAN, et al.,

11 Defendant(s).

12 13 Presently before the court is Magistrate Judge Daniel Albregts’s report and 14 recommendation (“R&R”) to enforce the settlement agreement and dismiss plaintiff’s case 15 with prejudice. (ECF No. 81). 16 This court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or 17 recommendations made by the magistrate.”

(b)(1). Where a party timely 18 objects to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, then the court is required to 19 “make a de novo determination of those portions of the [report and recommendation] to 20 which objection is made.”

21 Where a party fails to object, however, the court is not required to conduct “any 22 review at all…of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn,

140, 149 (1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that a district court is not required 24 to review a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation where no objections have been 25 filed. See United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (disregarding the 26 standard of review employed by the district court when reviewing a report and 27 recommendation to which no objections were made). 28 1 No objections were filed to the R&R in this case and the deadline to do so has passed. 2| Thus, the court is not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the R&R and hereby 3 | ADOPTS the magistrate judge’s findings. A Accordingly, 5| IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Judge Albregts’s R&R 6| (ECF No. 81) be, and the same hereby is, ACCEPTED in its entirety. 7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with 8 | prejudice. 9 The clerk of the court is instructed to close this case. 10 DATED March 30, 2023. btw ©. Atala 2 UNITED, STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

es C. Mahan District Judge _2-