DePetro v. Scally

4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7| FRANK DEPETRO, Case No. 2:22-cv-00817-MMD-NJK 8 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 9} v. [Docket No. 17] MICHAEL MINEYV, et al., 11 Defendant(s).

12 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the complaint. Docket 13] No. 17. No response has been filed. The Court is considering declining to screen the proposed 14] second amended complaint. See Olausen v. Murguia, 2014 WL 6065622 (D. Nev. Nov. 12, 2014).

Defendants are ordered to respond to the motion for leave to amend by April 10, 2023. To the 16]| extent Defendants do not oppose the granting of the motion, the Office of the Attorney General 17|| must indicate whether service will be accepted on behalf of the newly-named defendants by April 18] 17, 2023.

19 IT IS SO ORDERED.

20 Dated: April 3, 2023 Nancy JoKoppe 22 United States Magistrate Judge