District Court, D. Nevada, 2023

Plascencia v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company

Plascencia v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company
District Court, D. Nevada · Decided May 3, 2023
Plascencia v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company

Trial Court Opinion

WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP Darren T. Brenner, Esq.

2 Nevada Bar No. 8386 Stephanie Garabedian, Esq.

3 Nevada Bar No. 9612 7785 W. Sahara Ave., Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89117 (949) 477-5050; Fax: (702) 946-1345 [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant, Hartford Fire Insurance Company 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA SALVADOR PLASCENCIA, individually; and Case No.: 2:22-cv-01420-GMN-VCF KYLE HAIL, individually, Plaintiffs, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER vs. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut Corporation; DOES, I through X, inclusive; ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES, I through X, inclusive, Defendants.

18 COME NOW Defendant, Hartford Fire Insurance Company (“PHH”), and Plaintiffs Salvador Plascencia and Kyle Hail (“Plaintiffs”), by and through their respective counsel of records, and hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 21 1. Any party or non-party may designate as “confidential” (by stamping the relevant page or as otherwise set forth herein) any document or response to discovery which that party or non-party considers in good faith to contain nonpublic personal information (“NPI”) as defined by Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 6801-6809 et seq. (“Confidential Information”). Where a document or response consists of more than one page, the first page and each page on which Confidential Information appears shall be so designated.

27 2. A party or non-party may designate information disclosed during a deposition or in response to written discovery as “confidential:” by so indicating in said response or on the record at the deposition and requesting the preparation of a separate transcript of such material.

2 Additionally, a party or non-party may designate in writing, within twenty (20) days after receipt of said responses or of the deposition transcript for which the designation is proposed, that specific pages of the transcript and/or specific responses be treated as “confidential” information. Any other party may object to such proposal, in writing or on the record. Upon such objection, the parties shall follow the procedures described in paragraph 8 below. After any designation made according to the procedure set forth in this paragraph, the designated documents or information shall be treated according to the designation until the matter is resolved according to the procedures described in paragraph 8 below, and counsel for all parties shall be responsible for making all previously unmarked copies of the designated material in their possession or control with the specified designation.

12 3. All information produced or exchanged in the course of this case (other than information that is publicly available) shall be used by the party or parties to whom the information is produced solely for the purpose of this case.

15 4. Except with the prior written consent of the other parties, or upon prior order of this Court obtained with notice to opposing counsel, Confidential Information shall not be disclosed to any person other than: 18 (a) counsel for the respective parties in this litigation, including in-house 19 counsel and co-counsel retained for this litigation; 20 (b) employees of such counsel; 21 (c) individual parties, class representatives, any officer or employee of a party, 22 to the extent deemed necessary by Counsel for the prosecution of this 23 litigation; 24 (d) consultants or expert witnesses retained for the prosecution or defense of 25 this litigation, provided that each such person shall execute a copy of the 26 Certification attached to this Order as Exhibit A (which shall be retained 27 by counsel to the party so disclosing the Confidential Information and made 28 available for inspection by opposing counsel during the pendency or after 1 the termination of the action only upon good cause shown and upon order 2 of the Court) before being shown or given any Confidential Information and 3 provided that if the party chooses a consultant or expert employed by a 4 corporate defendant or one of its competitors, the party shall notify the 5 opposing party, or designating non-party, before disclosing any 6 Confidential Information to that individual and shall give the opposing party 7 an opportunity to move for a protective order preventing or limiting such 8 disclosure; 9 (e) any authors or recipients of the Confidential Information; 10 (f) the Court, personnel, and court reports; and 11 (g) witnesses (other than persons described in paragraph 4(e).) A witness shall 12 sign the Certification before being shown a confidential document.

13 Confidential Information may be disclosed to a witness who will not sign 14 the Certification only in a deposition at which the party who designated the 15 Confidential Information is represented or has been given notice that 16 Confidential Information shall be designated “Confidential” pursuant to 17 paragraph 2 above. Witnesses shown Confidential Information shall not be 18 allowed to retain copies.

19 5. Any persons receiving Confidential Information shall not reveal or discuss such information to or with any person who is not entitled to receive such information, except as set forth herein.

22 6. Unless otherwise permitted by statute, rule, or prior Court Order, papers filed with the Court under seal shall be accompanied by a contemporaneous motion for leave to file those documents under seal and shall be filed consistent with the Court’s electronic filing procedures.

25 Notwithstanding any agreement among the parties, the party seeking to file a paper under seal bears the burden of overcoming the presumption in favor of public access to papers filed in court.

27 See Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006).

1 7. A party may designate as “confidential” documents or discovery materials produced by a non-party by providing written notice to all parties of the relevant document numbers or other identification within thirty (30) days after receiving such documents or discovery materials. Any party or non-party may voluntarily disclose to others without restriction any information designated by that party or non-party as confidential, although a document may lose its confidential status if it is made public.

7 8. If a party contends that any material is not entitled to confidential treatment, such party may at any time give written notice to the party or non-party who designated the material.

9 The party or non-party who designated the material shall have twenty-five (days) from the receipt of such written notice to apply to the Court for an order designating the material as confidential.

11 The party or non-party seeking the order has the burden of establishing that the document is entitled to protection.

13 9. Notwithstanding any challenge to the designation of material as Confidential Information, all documents shall be treated as such and shall be subject to the provisions hereof unless and until one of the following occurs: 16 (a) the party or non-party claims that the material is Confidential Information 17 withdraws such designation in writing; or 18 (b) the party or non-party who claims that the material is Confidential 19 Information fails to apply to the Court for an Order designating the material 20 confidential within the time period specified above after receipt of a written 21 challenge to such designation; or 22 (c) the Court rules the material is not confidential.

23 10. All provisions of this Order restricting the communication or use of Confidential Information shall continue to be binding after the conclusion of this action, unless otherwise agreed or ordered. Upon conclusion of the litigation, a party in the possession of Confidential Information, other than that which is contained in pleadings, correspondence, and deposition transcripts, shall either (a) return such documents no later than thirty (30) days after conclusion of the action to counsel for the party or non-party, or (b) destroy such documents within the same time period.

3 11. The terms of this Stipulation and Order do not preclude, limit, restrict or otherwise apply to the use of documents at trial.

5 12. Nothing herein shall be deemed to waive any applicable privilege or work product protection, or to affect the ability of a party to seek relief for an inadvertent disclosure of material protected by privilege or work product protection.

8 13. Any witness or other person, firm, or entity from which is discovery is sought may be informed of and may obtain the protection of this Order by written advice to the parties’ respective counselor by oral advice at the time of any deposition or similar proceeding.

11 14. This Stipulated Protective Order may be modified by the Court at any time for good cause shown following notice to all parties and an opportunity to be heard. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to modify the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order.

14 Exhibit A 15 I, __________________________________, have been advised by counsel of record for __________________________________ in _________________________________________ of the protective order governing the delivery, publication, and disclosure of confidential documents and information produced in this litigation. I have read a copy of the protective order and agree to abide by its terms.

20 __________________________________ Signed __________________________________ Printed Name __________________________________ 25 Date 27 [Signatures on next page] 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED.

2 DATED this 2" day of May, 2023. DATED this 2" day of May, 2023.

PRINCE LAW GROUP WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP 5 /s/ Kevin T. Strong /s/ Stephanie Garabedian Dennis M. Prince, Esq. Darren Brenner, Esq.

6 Nevada Bar No. 5092 Nevada Bar No. 8386 Kevin T. Strong, Esq. Stephanie Garabedian, Esq.

7 Nevada Bar No. 12107 Nevada Bar No. 9612 g Andrew R. Brown, Esq. 7785 W. Sahara Ave., Suite 200 Nevada Bar No. 15875 Las Vegas, NV 89117 9 10801 West Charleston Blvd., Suite 560 Attorneys for Defendant, Hartford Fire Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 Insurance Company 10 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Kyle Hail 11 and Salvador Plascencia || IT ISSO ORDERED.

13 Dated this 34 day of May, 2023.

15 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.