Sinclair-Lewis v. Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc.

Nevada Bar #001107 ANDRE T. MARQUES Nevada Bar #014737 COOPER LEVENSON, P.A.

3016 West Charleston Boulevard - #195 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 (702)366-1125 FAX: (702) 366-1857 [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant SMITH’S FOOD & DRUG CENTERS, INC. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA SANDY ALECIA SINCLAIR-LEWIS, Case No. 2:20-cv-02063-JCM-VCF individually; Plaintiffs, vs. AMENDED SMITH’S FOOD & DRUG CENTERS, INC. JOINT PRE-TRIAL ORDER an Ohio Corporation; DOES I - X, and ROE CORPORATIONS I - X, inclusive, Defendants.

18 After pretrial proceedings in this case, 19 IT IS ORDERED: 20 I.

21 NATURE OF THE ACTION 22 PARTIES: 23 Plaintiff: SANDY SINCLAIR-LEWIS 24 Defendant: SMITH’S FOOD & DRUG CENTERS, INC. 25 RELIEF SOUGHT: 26 Plaintiff seeks general damages for pain, suffering, and special damages for medical expenses incurred and to be incurred in the future.

28 / / / 2 This case involves an alleged slip and fall accident that occurred at a Las Vegas SMITH’S grocery store on May 25, 2019. The parties dispute how the incident occurred. Defendant maintains that Plaintiff slipped and fell after she lost her balance while walking in the back aisle of the subject store. A single photograph taken after the incident by Plaintiff’s husband appears to show a small amount of liquid on the floor in the area of Plaintiff’s fall. Defendant contends that there is no evidence of how the liquid came to be on the floor, but Defendant alleges it was likely caused by another customer a short time prior to Plaintiff’s fall. Defendant further contends the subject aisle was reasonably maintained on the date of Plaintiff’s accident, and that the subject store did not have notice of the alleged foreign substance prior to the fall.

11 Plaintiff, on the other hand, contends that SMITH’S was negligent in that it created, owned, controlled, inspected, and/or maintained the premises in an unstable and dangerous manner so as to allow a hazardous condition, to exist on the Subject Premises. Specifically, Plaintiff alleges that a nearby freezer unit malfunctioned, causing water to leak onto the sales floor, which made it unreasonably slippery, and without proper warning of the hazard, caused Plaintiff, Sandy Alecia Sinclair-Lewis, to slip and fall. Plaintiff further contends, prior to the subject incident, SMITH’S was aware of issues with its freezer units leaking onto the sales floor, and failed to remedy the problem.

18 As a proximate result thereof, Plaintiff was seriously injured.

19 II.

20 STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION 21 This action was originated by the filing of a Complaint in the District Court, Clark County, Nevada on September 11, 2020. Defendant removed the case from State Court to Federal Court on November 9, 2020, citing diversity between the parties and that this Court has jurisdiction of the matter under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 and 28 U.S.C § 1441(b). This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 1346(b)(1), part of the FTCA.

26 / / / / / / / / / 2 FACTS ADMITTED BY THE PARTIES AND REQUIRE NO PROOF 1. Venue is proper in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada in Las Vegas, Nevada.

2. Plaintiff slipped and fell on May 25, 2019, at a SMITH’S grocery store in Las Vegas, Nevada.

6 IV.

7 FACTS, THOUGH NOT ADMITTED, WILL NOT BE CONTESTED AT TRIAL BY EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY 1. Plaintiff was shopping at Smith’s Store No. 376, located at 2385 East Windmill 9 Lane, in Las Vegas, Nevada on May 25, 2019. 10 V. 11 ISSUES OF FACT TO BE TRIED AND DETERMINED UPON TRIAL 12 The following are the issues of fact to be tried and determined at trial: 13 1. Whether Smith’s acted negligently; 14 2. Whether Defendant was negligent in maintaining their premises specifically, the flooring where Plaintiff fell; 3. Whether Smith’s had notice of the liquid; 4. Whether Plaintiff was comparatively negligent; 5. Whether Smith’s breached any duty of care owed to Plaintiff; 6. Whether the medical care and treatment received by Plaintiff was reasonable and 19 necessary and proximately caused by the subject incident; 20 7. Whether the medical care and treatment received by Plaintiff was causally related to the incident concerned in this litigation; 8. Whether the medical damages incurred are customary and reasonable for the medical 22 services provided; 23 9. Whether Plaintiff’s damage claims are recoverable pursuant to the requirements of the law; 10. Whether Plaintiff failed to mitigate her damages; 11. Whether Plaintiff has sustained her burden of proving negligence and damages 26 pursuant to the requirement of the law.

27 / / / / / / 2 ISSUES OF LAW TO BE TRIED AND DETERMINED UPON TRIAL 3 1. Whether Smith’s acted negligently; 4 2. Whether Smith’s had notice of the liquid; 5 3. Whether Plaintiff acted negligently; 6 4. Whether Smith’s breached any duty of care owed to Plaintiff; 7 5. Whether Plaintiff’s damage claims are recoverable pursuant to the requirements of the law; 6. Whether Plaintiff has sustained her burden of proving negligence and damages 9 pursuant to the requirement of the law.

10 VII.

11 Exhibits 12 (a) The following exhibits are stipulated into evidence in this case and may be so 13 marked by the clerk: 14 • (DEF-0000001 – DEF-0000004) - Incident Report (redacted); 15 • (DEF-0000005) - Evidence Report; 16 • (DEF-0000006 – DEF-0000007) - Sweeps/Floor Inspection Report; 17 • (DEF-0000008) - One (1) color copy of a photograph from the date of the subject incident; and • One (1) compilation DVD from the date of the incident: 30192710559 – Sandy 19 Sinclair-Lewis – Date of Loss: 05/25/19 – Store 376 – DXA Files (1 of 1).

20 Counsel for the parties have stipulated to the authenticity of medical records timely produced in this litigation so that neither party will need to call a Custodian of Records to authenticate medical records that may be offered into evidence. (b) As to the following exhibits, the party against whom the same will be offered objects to their admission on the grounds stated: (1) Plaintiff’s exhibits and Defendant’s objections: Exhibit Bate No Description Defendant’s objection 1. ER 000001 Medical Bill from Community Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, Ambulance, dated 5/25/2019 and 901.

2 2. ER000002- Medical Bill and Records from St. Rose Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, ER000114 Dominican Hospital- Siena Campus, and 901. dated 5/25/2019 3. ER000115 Medical Bill from Vituity Partners, Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, dated 5/25/2019 and 901.

5 4. ER000116- Medical Bill from Radiology Associates Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, ER000117 of Nevada, dated 5/25/2019 and 901.

5. ER000118- Medical Bill and Records from Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 7 ER000166 Steinberg Diagnostic Medical Imaging, and 901. dated 5/25/2019 – 12/9/2020 6. ER000167- Medical Bill and Records from Khavkin Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, ER000370 Clinic, dated 6/3/2019 – 12/1/2020; and 901.

9 ER2750- 3/16/2021 – 3/23/2021 ER2754 7. ER000371- Medical Bill and Records from Desert Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 11 ER000395 Orthopedic Center, dated 6/5/2019 – and 901.

12/21/2020 8. ER000396- Medical Bill and Records from Total Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, ER000446 Wellness Family Medicine, dated and 901.

6/6/2019 – 10/30/2019 9. ER000447- Medical Bill and Records from Rapid Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, ER000597 Rehab and Wellness Center, dated and 901.

15 7/9/2019 – 3/17/2020 10. ER000598- Medical Bill and Records from Desert Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 16 ER000607 Cardiovascular Consultant, dated and 901.

7/19/2019 – 8/15/2019 11. ER000608- Medical Bill and Records from Palm Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 18 ER000621 Medical Group, dated 7/29/2019 – and 901.

8/14/2019 12. ER000622- Medical Bill and Records from Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, ER002221 Henderson Hospital, dated 8/26/2019 – and 901.

9/27/2019 13. ER002222- Medical Bill and Records from Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, ER002237 SimonMed, dated 6/17/2019 and 901.

22 14. ER002273- Medical Bill and Records from Las Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, ER002311 Vegas Radiology, dated 5/28/2019- and 901.

23 3/1/2021 15. ER002312- Medical Bill and Records from Red Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, ER002332 Rock Neurology & Pain Management, and 901.

25 dated 11/23/2020-2/22/2021 16. ER002342- Medical Bill and Records from Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 26 ER002360 Resurgens Orthopedic, dated 5/12/2021- and 901.

ER2669 – 6/2/2021; 5/12/2021-12/15/2021 ER2749 17. ER002374- Medical Bill and Records from Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, ER002463 Comprehensive Spine & Pain, dated and 901.

8/13/2021-12/30/2021 18. ER002238 Color photograph of the scene of the Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, incident and 901 19. ER002361– Color photographs of the scene of the Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, ER002373 incident from site inspection on and 901 10/27/2021 20. ER 2464 – David E. Fish, M.D. Medical Records Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, ER 2526 Review and Future Medical Care Cost 801, and 901.

8 Analysis dated January 8, 2022, CV, Testimony History and Fee Schedule 21. ER 2527- Stan V. Smith of Smith Economics Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, ER 2631 Group Expert Report dated June 30, and 901.

2021, CV, Testimony History and Fee 11 Schedule 22. ER 2632 – Adam Hjorth of Hobble Creek Services, Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403 12 ER 2652 LLC Expert Report dated January 7, and 801.

2022, CV, Testimony History and Fee Schedule 23. ER 2653 – David E. Fish, M.D. Medical Records Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, ER 2659 Review and Future Medical Care Cost and 901.

15 Analysis (FCA) dated January 15, 2022 24. ER2660 – Adam Hjorth of Hobble Creek Services, Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 16 ER 2661 LLC Supplemental Expert Report dated and 801.

February 7, 2022 25. ER 2662 – David E. Fish, M.D. TeleMedicine Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 18 ER 2668 Medical Evaluation and 901.

26. ER 2755 – Adam Hjorth of Hobble Creek Services, Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 19 ER 2756 LLC Second Supplemental Expert 407, 702, and 801.

Report dated April 8, 2022 27. ER 2757 – David E. Fish, M.D. Medical Records Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 21 ER 2761 Review Rebuttal Report dated March and 901.

19, 2022 28. ER 2762 – David E. Fish, M.D. Medical Records Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, ER 2767 Review Rebuttal Report #4 dated April and 901.

23 15, 2022 29. ER002239- Pay Details from Tesla, Inc. for Sandy Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 24 ER002242 Sinclair-Lewis, dated 11/30/2020 – 801 and 901.

25 3/21/2021 30. ER002243- Plaintiff’s Federal Income Tax filings for Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 26 ER002272 2018, 2019, and 2020 and 901.

31. ER002333– Plaintiff’s W-2 Wage and Tax Statement Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 27 ER002341 for 2018, 2019, and 2020 and 901.

2 Production and Requests for Admissions from Defendants.

3 Plaintiff reserves the right to utilize any and all documents produced by Defendant or any party in this litigation.

5 Plaintiff may offer documents needed for rebuttal or impeachment, including, but not limited to, discovery obtained during the course of litigation as permitted, pleadings, and other documentation in accordance with admissible evidence.

8 Plaintiff may offer documents produced by Plaintiff and Defendant, upon which experts have reviewed and formed opinions, including but not limited to, reports, pleadings, correspondence, notes, and medical records and billing.

11 Plaintiff expects to utilize any and all writings, published works, journals, treatises, medical texts, affidavits, films, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, reports, computer tapes, computer discs, and other data compilations, and other medical reference materials which Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff’s expert use in support of Plaintiff’s allegations.

15 Deposition transcripts will be used as needed for rebuttal or impeachment. Deposition transcripts may also be used for direct examination if the witness is unable to appear at the time of trial.

18 Any and all rebuttal exhibits.

19 Plaintiff reserves the right to use any and all other exhibits needed for rebuttal and/or impeachment.

21 All pleadings and discovery obtained during the course of litigation as permitted, and in accordance with admissible evidence.

23 (2)Defendant’s exhibits and Plaintiff’s objections: Exhibit Bate No Description Plaintiff’s objection 32. (DEF-0000001 – Incident Report DEF-0000004) 33. (DEF-0000005) Evidence Report 34. (DEF-0000006 – Sweeps/Floor Inspection DEF-0000007) Report 35. (DEF-0000008) One (1) color copy of a photograph from the date of the subject incident 36. N/A One (1) compilation DVD from the date of the incident: 6 30192710559 – Sandy Sinclair-Lewis – Date of Loss: 7 05/25/19 – Store 376 – DXA Files (1 of 1).

9 Defendant reserves the right to utilize any or all of the exhibits listed by Plaintiff or those listed below as necessary to impeach or rebut evidence presented by Plaintiffs at trial: 11 37. Letter from David Markman, Esq. to Sedgwick CMS dated June 12, 2019 (DEF-0000009); Plaintiff’s objections: Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, and 411 38. Letter from Sedgwick CMS to Vince Ditcharo dated July 9, 2019 (DEF-0000010); 13 Plaintiff’s objections: Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 408, 409 and 411 Proctor v. Castelletti, 112 Nev. 88, 911 P.2d 853 15 39. Letter from Optum to Sedgwick CMS dated July 11, 2019 (DEF-0000011) ; Plaintiff’s objections: Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 408, 409 and 411 Proctor v. 16 Castelletti, 112 Nev. 88, 911 P.2d 853 40. Letter from Optum to Sedgwick CMS dated July 18, 2019 (DEF-0000012) ; 18 Plaintiff’s objections: Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 408, 409 and 411 Proctor v. Castelletti, 112 Nev. 88, 911 P.2d 853 41. Letter from Sedgwick CMS to Yevgeniy A. Khavkin, M.D., P.C. dated July 23, 2019 (DEF-0000013); Plaintiff’s objections: Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 408, 409 and 411 Proctor v. Castelletti, 112 Nev. 88, 911 P.2d 853 22 42. Letter from Sedgwick CMS to Optum dated July 23, 2019 (DEF-0000014) ; Plaintiff’s objections: Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 408, 409 and 411 Proctor v. 23 Castelletti, 112 Nev. 88, 911 P.2d 853 43. Letter from Sedgwick CMS to Community Ambulance dated July 30, 2019 25 (DEF-0000015); Plaintiff’s objections: Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 408, 409 and 411 Proctor v. Castelletti, 112 Nev. 88, 911 P.2d 853 44. Letter from Optum to Sedgwick CMS dated January 30, 2020 (DEF-0000016 – DEF-0000017); Plaintiff’s objections: Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 408, 409 and 411 Proctor v. Castelletti, 112 Nev. 88, 911 P.2d 853 Plaintiff’s objections: Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 408, 409 and 411 Proctor v. 2 Castelletti, 112 Nev. 88, 911 P.2d 853 46. Letter from Optum to Sedgwick CMS dated June 19, 2020 4 (DEF-0000019 – DEF-0000020); Plaintiff’s objections: Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 408, 409 and 411 Proctor v. Castelletti, 112 Nev. 88, 911 P.2d 853 47. Letter from Sedgwick CMS to Optum dated July 9, 2020 (DEF-0000021); Plaintiff’s 6 objections: Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 408, 409 and 411 Proctor v. Castelletti, 112 Nev. 88, 911 P.2d 853 8 48. Letter from Ryan Harrison, Esq. to Sedgwick CMS dated July 27, 2020 (DEF-0000022); Plaintiff’s objections: Fed R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 408, 409 and 411 9 Proctor v. Castelletti, 112 Nev. 88, 911 P.2d 853 49. Plaintiff’s medical records from: Kimberly Adams, M.D. (KA-0000001 – KA-0000089); Fidelis Edosomwan, M.D. (FE-0000001 – FE-0000024); Khavkin Clinic (KC-0000001 – KC-0000062); Las Vegas Radiology (LVR-0000001 – LVR-0000039); Palm Medical Group (PMG-0000001 – PMG-0000083); Red Rock Neurology (RRN-0000001 – RRN-0000020); and Steinberg Diagnostic Medical Imaging Centers (SDM-0000001 – SDM-0000047) Resurgens Orthopedics (RO-0000001 – RO-0000572) Shyam Shivdasani, M.D. (SS-0000001 – SS-0000095) Defendant reserves the right to utilize the following as necessary to impeach or rebut evidence presented by Plaintiffs at trial: Store diagram – Demonstrative Evidence 19 Deposition exhibits Expert Report of Brian K. Jones, MSBE, PE, ACTAR, CXLT 20 Expert Report of Vladimir Sinkov MD 21 Defendant reserves the right to use any exhibit listed or introduced by Plaintiff. Defendant reserves the right to use Plaintiff’s medical records, provided by either party, as needed for impeachment evidence as permitted by applicable court rules. Defendant reserves the right to use any statements, discovery responses, and/or deposition testimony for purposes of refreshing recollection, impeachment, and/or substantively as party admissions. Defendant reserves the right to use demonstrative evidence.

27 (c) Electronic evidence: Electronic evidence: The parties anticipate utilizing the court’s electronic evidence display system. The parties do not anticipate utilizing native electronic evidence the jury for deliberations. The parties will coordinate with the courtroom administrator as contemplated by the Local Rules.

4 (d) Depositions: 5 (1) Plaintiff will offer the following depositions: 6 Plaintiff does not intend at this time to offer page and line designations for any deposition transcripts. In the event Plaintiff learns that a witness is unavailable to testify at trial, Plaintiff will notify all parties and the Court of page and line designations of the unavailable witness’ deposition transcript to offer at trial. Plaintiff reserves the right to use deposition transcripts to refresh recollection, to impeach, and otherwise to use at trial in accordance with applicable rules, e.g., Fed. R.Civ. P. 32, and Fed. R. Evid. 801(d).

12 Plaintiff reserves the right to use any and all deposition transcripts and videotaped depositions deemed necessary for impeachment and/or rebuttal purposes.

14 (2)Defendant will offer the following depositions: Defendant does not intend at this time to offer page and line designations for any deposition transcripts. In the event Defendant learns that a witness is unavailable to testify at trial, Defendant will notify all parties and the Court of page and line designations of the unavailable witness’ deposition transcript to offer at trial.

18 Defendant reserves the right to use deposition transcripts to refresh recollection, to impeach, and otherwise to use at trial in accordance with applicable rules, e.g., Fed. R. Civ. P. 32, and Fed. R. Evid. 801(d).

21 (e)Objections to depositions: 22 (1)Defendant objects to Plaintiff’s depositions as follows: 23 Defendant reserves the right to object to any deposition testimony being offered by 24 Plaintiff.

25 (2) Plaintiff objects to Defendant’s depositions as follows: 26 VIII.

27 Witnesses that May be Called at Trial 28 The following witnesses may be called by the parties at trial: 2 Plaintiff may call the following witnesses at trial: 3 1. SANDY ALECIA SINCLAIR-LEWIS c/o Justin G. Randall, Esq.

4 ER INJURY ATTORNEYS 1700 S. Pavilion Center Dr. Ste. 530 5 Las Vegas, NV 89135 6 2.. PHILLIP LEWIS c/o Justin G. Randall, Esq.

7 ER INJURY ATTORNEYS 1700 S. Pavilion Center Dr. Ste. 530 8 Las Vegas, NV 89135 9 3. Nyree Neder- NRCP 30(6)(6) for SMITH’S FOOD & DRUG CENTERS, INC. 10 c/o Jerry S. Busby, Esq.

Gregory A. Kraemer, Esq.

11 COOPER LEVENSON, P.A.

3016 West Charleston Boulevard - #195 12 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 13 4. Yesica Lopez, Custodian of Records and/or Person Most Knowledgeable 14 Community Ambulance P.O. Box 30102, Dept N809 15 Salt Lake City, UT 84130 16 5. Amy Zanik, Custodian of Records and/or Person Most Knowledgeable 17 St. Rose Dominican Hospital- Siena Campus 3001 St. Rose Parkway 18 Henderson, Nevada 89052 19 6. Laura Castillo, Custodian of Records and/or Jonathon McGarry, M.D., and/or 20 Person Most Knowledgeable and/or Vituity Partners 21 P.O. Box 45390 San Francisco, California 94145 7. Steven Sogge, M.D. and/or 23 Person Most Knowledgeable and/or Custodian of Records for 24 Radiology Associates of Nevada P.O. Box 30077, Dept 305 25 Salt Lake City, Utah 84130 26 8. Rolando Garcia, Custodian of Records and/or Person Most Knowledgeable 27 Desert Orthopaedic Center 2800 E Desert Inn Rd., Ste 100 28 Las Vegas, Nevada 89121 Person Most Knowledgeable and/or 2 Custodian of Records for Khavkin Clinic 3 653 N Town Center Dr., Ste 602 Las Vegas, Nevada 89144 10. Theresa Lopez, Custodian of Records, and/or 5 Person Most Knowledgeable and/or Rapid Rehab- Henderson 6 2475 W Horizon Ridge Pkwy, Ste 100 Henderson, Nevada 89052 11. Zia Khan, M.D., and/or 8 Person Most Knowledgeable and/or Custodian of Records for 9 Desert Cardiovascular Consultants 5785 S Fort Apache Rd., Ste 100A 10 Las Vegas, Nevada 89148 11 12. Adriana Ruiz, PA-C, and/or Person Most Knowledgeable and/or 12 Custodian of Records for Palm Medical Group 13 9280 W Sunset Rd., Ste 306 Las Vegas, Nevada 89148 13. Yevgeniy Khavkin, M.D. and/or 15 Person Most Knowledgeable and/or Henderson Hospital 16 1050 W Galleria Dr. Henderson, Nevada 89011 14. Nany M. Rice, Custodian of Records and/or 18 Person Most Knowledgeable and/or Steinberg Diagnostic Medical Imaging 19 2950 S Maryland Pkwy Las Vegas, Nevada 89109 15. Rori Himes, Custodian of Records, and/or 21 Person Most Knowledgeable and/or Total Wellness Family Medicine 22 9640 W Tropicana Ave., Ste 116 Las Vegas, Nevada 89147 16. Veronica Muniz, Custodian of Records and/or 24 Person Most Knowledgeable and/or SimonMed 25 PO Box 204165 Dallas, Texas 75320 17. Mario Gonzalez, Custodian of Records and/or 27 Person Most Knowledgeable and/or Las Vegas Radiology 28 7500 Smoke Ranch Rd., Suite 100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89128 Person Most Knowledgeable and/or 2 Red Rock Neurology & Pain Management 1905 McDaniel St., Suite 102 3 North Las Vegas, Nevada 89030 4 19. V K Puppala, M.D. and/or Stacy Kendrick, M.D. and/or 5 Anthony Carantzas, M.D. and/lor Jasmine Rivera, Custodian of Records, and/or 6 Person Most Knowledgeable and/or Resurgens Orthopaedic 7 270 Chastain Rd. Kennesaw, Georgia 30144 20. V K Puppala, M.D. and/or 9 Hannah Hermon, Custodian of Records and/or Person Most Knowledgeable and/or 10 Comprehensive Spine & Pain Permain Way Ste D 11 Villa Rica, Georgia 30180 12 21. David E. Fish, M.D.

UCLA School of Medicine 13 1350 Davies Drive Beverly Hills, California 90210 22. Stan V. Smith, Ph.D.

15 Smith Economic Group, LTD. 1165 N. Clark Street, Suite 600 16 Chicago, Illinois 60610 17 23. Adam Hjorth Hobble Creek Services, LLC 18 275 Hampton Ridge Ct. Henderson, Nevada 89002 20 Plaintiff reserves the right to call any witness named by Defendant. Plaintiff reserves the right to call any witness as may be necessary for the purpose of impeachment. Plaintiff may call any and all witnesses called in rebuttal to testimony given by Defendant’s witnesses. Plaintiff reserves the right to object to any of Defendant’s witnesses at the time of trial.

24 (b)Defendant’s witnesses: 25 Defendant may call the following witnesses at trial: 26 1. Sandy Alecia Sinclair-Lewis, Plaintiff c/o Justin G. Randall, Esq.

27 ER INJURY ATTORNEYS 1700 S. Pavilion Center Dr. Ste. 530 28 Las Vegas, NV 89135 (702)968-7500 c/o Justin G. Randall, Esq.

2 ER INJURY ATTORNEYS 1700 S. Pavilion Center Dr. Ste. 530 3 Las Vegas, NV 89135 (702)968-7500 3. Nyree Neder 5 5161 Cereus Court Las Vegas, NV 89146 6 (702)797-0049 7 4. Michael Fox 2443 Wilder Road 8 Bullhead City, AZ 86442 (928)219-7486 5. Julian Gonzales 10 c/o SMITH’S Store No. 358 2540 S. Maryland Parkway 11 Las Vegas, NV 89109 (702)735-8928 6. Jacob Dufault 13 1460 Lawman Court Las Vegas, NV 89119 14 (702)673-0936 15 7. Mariah Beasley 2456 Via De Milano 16 Henderson, NV 89074 (702)906-8037 8. Brian K. Jones, MSBE, P.E., ACTAR, CXLT 18 American Bio Engineers 6351 Hinson Street - Suite R 19 Las Vegas, NV 89118 (702)395-6768 9. Vladimir Sinkov, M.D.

21 Sinkov Spine Center 1627 East Windmill Lane, Suite 100 22 Las Vegas, NV 89123 (702)710-1010 24 Defendant reserves the right to call any of the healthcare providers identified by either party during this litigation as a witness if needed to impeach or rebut evidence presented by Plaintiff. Defendant also reserves the rights to call impeachment and/or rebuttal witnesses at trial, as permitted by applicable rules, and to call any witnesses identified by Plaintiff.

28 / / / 1 IX.

2 Proposed Trial Dates 3 The attorneys or parties have met and jointly offer these three trial dates: 4 November 6, 2023 January 22, 2024 February 12, 2024 5 It is expressly understood by the undersigned that the court will set the trial of this matter on 6|| one of the agreed-upon dates if possible; if not, the trial will be set at the convenience of the court’s 7\| calendar.

8 X.

9 Estimated Time for Trial 10 It is estimated that the trial will take seven (7) days.

DATED this 12th day of May, 2023. DATED this 12th day of May, 2023 12\) ER INJURY ATTORNEYS COOPER LEVENSON, P.A. iy JUSTIN G. RANDALL, ESQ. /s/ JERRY S. BUSBY, ESQ. ——____________ oo —_.

JUSTIN G. RANDALL, ESQ. JERRY S. BUSBY 15|| Nevada Bar No. 12476 Nevada Bar #001107 4795 South Durango Drive ANDRE T. MARQUES 16|| Las Vegas, Nevada 89147 Nevada Bar #014737 Telephone: (702) 968-7500 3016 West Charleston Boulevard - #195 Facsimile: (702) 968-7525 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 1|| Attorneys for Plaintiff (702) 366-1125 Sandy Alecia Sinclair-Lewis FAX: (702) 366-1857 19 Attorneys for Defendant 50 Smith’s Food & Drug Centers, Inc. 21 XI.

22 Action by the Court 23 This case is set for court/trial on the fixed/stacked calendar at the United States District Court, District of Nevada at 333 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89101 on 25|| January 22, 2024 at 9:00 AM Calendar call will be held on YaNuary 17, 2024 at 5 1:30 p.m.

26 Dated May 16, 2023.

Mbt C. Ata lian 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE