Adams v. Dwyer

District Court, D. Nevada

Adams v. Dwyer

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA Brandon Adams, Case No.: 2:23-cv-0572-JAD-EJY 4 Plaintiff Order Adopting Report and v. Recommendation and Dismissing Case Molly C. Dwyer, [ECF Nos. 1, 6] 7 Defendant 8 The magistrate judge has screened Plaintiff Brandon Adams’s complaint and recommends that it be dismissed because the named defendant, as a federal court employee, is 10} }immune from suit as a matter of law and because Adams’s complaint is incoherent and fails to any plausible claim for relief. The deadline for Adams to object to that recommendation expired, and he neither objected nor moved to extend the deadline to do so. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.””” 14|| Having reviewed the report and recommendation, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do. 15 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 16|| Recommendation [ECF No. 6] is ADOPTED in its entirety. This case is DISMISSED with 17} prejudice for the reasons stated in that report, plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 1] is DENIED as moot, and the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. 0 US. District Judge J fanjfer A. Dorsey Dated: May 17, 2023 21 ECFNo.6 Schmidt v. Johnstone,

263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226

(D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn,

474 U.S. 140, 150

(1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003).

Reference

Status
Unknown