1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA Brandon G. Adams, Case No.: 2:23-cv-0446-JAD-EJY 4 Plaintiff Order Adopting Report and v. Recommendation and Dismissing Case 6|| T. Roush-Wallace, et al., [ECF Nos. 3, 6] 7 Defendants 8 The magistrate judge has screened Plaintiff Brandon G. Adams’s complaint and recommends that it be dismissed because the named defendants, as court employees, are immune from suit as a matter of law.'! The deadline for Adams to object to that recommendation has expired, and he neither objected nor moved to extend the deadline to do so. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.””” Having reviewed the report and recommendation, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do. 14 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 15|| Recommendation [ECF No. 5] is ADOPTED in its entirety. This case is DISMISSED with 16}| prejudice for the reasons stated in that report, plaintiffs application to proceed in forma 17} pauperis [ECF No. 3] is DENIED as moot, and the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE.

U.S. District rage Jenni Cooma 20 Dated: May 17, 2023 21 ECFNo.6 Schmidt v. Johnstone,

(D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn,

(1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003).