Spann v. Bank of America

4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA DAYNA SPANN, Case No. 2:23-cv-00116-JAD-NJK 8 Plaintiff(s), Order ov. [Docket No. 17] 10! BANK OF AMERICA, 11 Defendant(s).

12 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to stay discovery pending resolution of its 13] motion to dismiss. Docket No. 17; see also Docket No. 8 (motion to dismiss). Plaintiff filed a 14] response in opposition. Docket No. 20; see also Docket No. 18. In assessing the circumstances 15] and the governing standards, see, e.g., Kor Media Grp., LLC v. Green, 294 F.R.D. 579, 581 (D.

16] Nev. 2013), the Court finds that a stay of discovery is warranted.

17 Accordingly, Defendant’s motion to stay discovery is GRANTED. If the resolution of the 18] motion to dismiss does not result in the termination of this case, an amended discovery plan must 19} be filed within 14 days of the order resolving the motion to dismiss.

20 IT IS SO ORDERED.

21 Dated: June 1, 2023 he.

Nancy J. Koppe) * 23 United States Magistrate Judge