Herndon v. Neven
Herndon v. Neven
Trial Court Opinion
1
2
3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5 THOMAS WRAY HERNDON, Case No. 3:20-cv-00489-ART-CLB
6 Petitioner, ORDER v. 7 DWIGHT NEVEN, et al., 8 Respondents. 9 10 This habeas matter is before the Court on Petitioner Thomas Wray 11 Herndon’s unopposed motion for stay and leave to file amended opposition to 12 motion to dismiss (ECF No. 71). 13 Petitioner challenges a 2015 judgment and conviction imposed by the 14 Second Judicial District Court of Washoe County. Respondents moved to dismiss 15 the petition as untimely and Grounds 5, 6, and 7 as unexhausted. (ECF No. 48.) 16 The Court granted Respondents’ motion to dismiss, in part, and denied, in part, 17 finding Ground 5 unexhausted. (ECF No. 66.) The Court denied Respondents’ 18 motion to dismiss the petition as untimely without prejudice for the parties to 19 address equitable tolling issues at an evidentiary hearing. (Id.) 20 Petitioner represents that counsel for Petitioner came into possession of 21 evidence indicating that Petitioner’s state petition was received by the Second 22 Judicial District Court by the filing deadline. (ECF No. 71 at 2.) In June 2023, 23 Petitioner filed a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Nevada Rule of Civil 24 Procedure 60(B)(6) in state court, and the motion remains pending. Petitioner 25 requests a stay pending completion of state court proceedings, leave to file an 26 amended opposition to Respondents’ motion to dismiss, and leave to address the 27 status of Ground 5 within 30 days of the case being reopened. Respondents do 28 1 || not oppose Petitioner’s request and the parties agree that Respondent should be 2 || able to respond to Petitioner’s amended opposition. 3 The Court finds that a stay and abeyance is warranted as the state court 4 || proceedings will likely impact the ongoing federal habeas proceedings. The Court 5 || will administratively close this action. Within 45 days of entry of the issuance of 6 || the remittitur by the Supreme Court of Nevada at the conclusion of all state court 7 || proceedings,! Petitioner must return to federal court with a motion to reopen 8 || wherein Petitioner may renew his request for leave to file an amended opposition 9 || to Respondents’ motion to dismiss and leave to address the status of Ground 5. 10 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED as follows: 11 1. Petitioner Thomas Wray Herndon’s unopposed Motion to Stay Case 12 (ECF No. 71) is granted. 13 2. This action is STAYED pending completion of the state court 14 proceedings. 15 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively close this action 16 until such time as the Court grants a motion to reopen the case. 17 4. Within 45 days of entry of the issuance of the remittitur by the 18 Supreme Court of Nevada at the conclusion of all state court 19 proceedings, Petitioner must file a motion to reopen wherein 20 Petitioner may renew his request for leave to file an amended 21 opposition to Respondents’ motion to dismiss and leave to address 22 the status of Ground 5. 23 DATED THIS 7th day of July 2023. 24 Ars jlosed Jd 25 ANNE'R. TRAUM 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27 || 1 If certiorari review will be sought or thereafter is being sought, either party may move to extend the stay for the duration of such proceedings. Cf. Lawrence v. 28 || Florida,
549 U.S. 327, 335(2007).
Reference
- Status
- Unknown