Sanchez v. Rigney
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 kee 4 JASMINE PAUL SANCHEZ, Case No. 3:22-CV-00109-ART-CLB 5 Plaintiff, ORDER TO FILE OPPOSITION TO 6 y MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 7 CHET RIGNEY, 8 Defendant.
10 On July 5, 2023, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 23.)
11 | Plaintiff was given notice of the motion pursuant to the requirements of Klingele v. Ejikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988), and Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. | 1998) (ECF No. 28). To date, Plaintiff has failed to file an opposition.
14 The Court will sua sponte grant Plaintiff one extension of time to August 30, 2023, | to file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment. No further extensions of time | shall be granted. If Plaintiff fails to file an opposition, the motion will be submitted to the | court for decision.
18 IT IS SO ORDERED.
19| DATED: July 31, 2023. .
20 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.