Miller v. Albertson's Corp.
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA DOMINIC MILLER, Case No. 2:22-cv-01143-GMN-NJK 6 Plaintiff, ORDER V. [Docket No. 7] 8] ALBERTSON’S CORP., et al., 9 Defendants.
10 Plaintiff has failed to update his address. See Docket No. 7. “A party, not the district court, bears the burden of keeping the court apprised of any changes in his mailing address.” Carey v. 12|| King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1441 (9th Cir. 1988); see also In re Hammer, 940 F.2d 524, 526 (9th Cir. 13], 1991). To that end, the local rules require that litigants immediately file with the Court written 14] notification of any change of address, and expressly warn that failure to do so may result in case- 15]| dispositive sanctions. See Local Rule IA 3-1.
16 Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a notice of changed address by 17|| September 5, 2023. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN 18] DISMISSAL OF THIS CASE.
19 IT IS SO ORDERED.
20 Dated: August 3, 2023 21 LOS Zn.
Nancy J.Koppe 22 United Siates Magistrate Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.