Frausto v. United States of America

District Court, D. Nevada

Frausto v. United States of America

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

MARCO FRAUSTO, Case No. 2:23-cv-01140-RFB-NJK 7 Plaintiff(s), gly. ORDER 9| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., 10 Defendant(s). 11 Plaintiff has failed to update his address. See Docket No. 5 (mail returned as undeliverable). “A party, not the district court, bears the burden of keeping the court apprised of 13] any changes in his mailing address.” Carey v. King,

856 F.2d 1439, 1441

(9th Cir. 1988); see also 14] Zn re Hammer,

940 F.2d 524, 526

(9th Cir. 1991). To that end, the local rules require that litigants 15] immediately file with the Court written notification of any change of address, and expressly warn 16] that failure to do so may result in case-dispositive sanctions. See Local Rule IA 3-1. 17 Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a notice of changed address by 18] September 7, 2023. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THIS CASE. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: August 7, 2023 . 22 0 a on Nancy J. Koppe 23 United States Wlagistrate Judge 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown