Masch v. Social Security

District Court, D. Nevada

Masch v. Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6 MARK CHARLES MASCH, Case No. 2:22-cv-01972-NJK

7 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 8 v. [Docket No. 25] 9 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, 10 Defendant(s). 11 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for voluntary dismissal. Docket No. 25. No 12 response is required. The Court does not require a hearing. See Local Rule 78-1. For the reasons 13 discussed below, the motion for voluntary dismissal is GRANTED. 14 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) states that “an action may be dismissed at the 15 plaintiff’s request only by court order, on terms that the court considers proper.” Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 16 41(a)(2). Unless a court explicitly states otherwise, “a dismissal under this paragraph (2) is without 17 prejudice.” Id. The Ninth Circuit has held that “a district court should grant a motion for voluntary 18 dismissal under Rule 41(a)(2) unless a defendant can show that it will suffer some plain legal 19 prejudice as a result.” Smith v. Lenches,

263 F.3d 972, 975

(9th Cir. 2001). “Legal prejudice” 20 means “prejudice to some legal interest, some legal claim, [or] some legal argument.”

Id. at 976

. 21 Motions for voluntary dismissal are “addressed to the district court’s sound discretion and the 22 court’s order will not be disturbed unless the court has abused its discretion.” Stevedoring Servs. 23 of America v. Armilla Intern. B.V.,

889 F.2d 919

, 921 (9th Cir. 1989). 24 The instant case arises from a final administrative decision by the Commissioner of Social 25 Security denying Plaintiff’s application for Supplemental Security Income. See Docket Nos. 20, 26 22, 23. Plaintiff died on June 1, 2023, and on September 5, 2023, his counsel later filed the instant 27 motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2). See Docket No. 25 at 2. Plaintiff submits 28 that there are no proper parties who are owed any payments under the Commissioner’s regulations 1} and that Defendant consents to the instant motion. See id. Therefore, the Court finds Defendant 2] will not suffer prejudice as a result of the dismissal. 3 Accordingly, the motion for voluntary dismissal is GRANTED and Plaintiff's complaint 4! is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Court INSTRUCTS the Clerk’s Office to close this case. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: September 6, 2023. Ke. NANCY J. KOPPE * 8 UNITED STATES.MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 .

10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown