Anderson v. Nye County Sheriff's Department
Anderson v. Nye County Sheriff's Department
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 RAHMAN ANDERSON, 7 Case No. 2:23-cv-00749-RFB-NJK Plaintiff(s), 8 Order v. 9 [Docket No. 13] NYE COUNTY SHERIFF’S 10) DEPARTMENT, 11 Defendant(s). 12 Both sides of this case are represented by veteran attorneys with significant experience in 13} federal court. And, yet, they have filed a discovery plan referencing the Honorable Elayna J. 141 Youchah as a “magistrate.” Docket No. 13 at 3. There is no such thing in the federal system as a 15} “magistrate,” as the title for that position was changed more than 30 years ago to “United States 16] Magistrate Judge.” E.g., Taddeo v. American Invsco Corp.,
2015 WL 751072, at *2 n.2 (D. Nev. 17] Feb. 20, 2015) (citing Williams v. City of Mesa,
2010 WL 2803880, at *2 n.1 (D. Ariz. July 15, 18] 2010)).! The discovery plan (Docket No. 13) is DENIED without prejudice. An amended 19] discovery plan must be filed by September 15, 2023. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: September 8, 2023 22 7 x eo Nancy J..Koppe 23 United □□□ agistrate Judge 24 25 26
' There is also no such thing as a “magistrate court.” But see Docket No. 13 at 3. There 28|| is, instead, a United States District Court, which has different types of judges sitting on it together.
Reference
- Status
- Unknown