Martin v. Garrett
Martin v. Garrett
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5 VERNON MARTIN, Case No. 3:23-cv-00105-RCJ-CLB
6 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION 7 v. FOR STAY
8 TIM GARRETT, et al., [ECF No. 10]
9 Respondents.
10 Petitioner Vernon Martin initiated this habeas corpus action on or about March 16, 2023. 11 (ECF No. 1.) On June 26, 2023, the Court appointed the Federal Public Defender to represent 12 Martin and gave Martin 90 days to file an amended petition or seek other appropriate relief. (ECF 13 No. 9.) Martin has timely complied by filing a motion for stay. (ECF No. 10.) In his motion, Martin 14 states that his initial state post-conviction proceedings are still ongoing and that he filed his federal 15 habeas petition as a protective petition. See Pace v. DeGuglielmo,
544 U.S. 408, 416–17 (2005). 16 Respondents do not object to a stay. (ECF No. 10 at 2.) 17 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner Vernon Martin’s unopposed motion for 18 stay (ECF No. 10) is granted. This action is stayed while Martin completes his state habeas 19 proceedings. The Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively close this case. 20 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that following the conclusion of Martin’s state-court 21 proceedings, Martin must, within 45 days, file a motion to lift the stay in this action. 22 23 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action will be subject to dismissal if Martin does comply with the time limits in this Order, or if he otherwise fails to proceed with diligence 3|| during the stay. 4 Dated: September 25, 2023
ROBERT C. JOWHS 6 UNITED STATE§$ DISTRICT COURT 7 8 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Reference
- Status
- Unknown