Mays v. Barclays
Mays v. Barclays
Trial Court Opinion
1
2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 * * * 5 April Mays, Case No. 2:23-cv-00952-RFB-DJA 6 Plaintiff, 7 Order v. 8 Barclays; et al., 9 Defendants. 10 11 Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion1 to stay discovery. (ECF No. 17). The 12 parties move to stay discovery pending the outcome of the Early Neutral Evaluation (“ENE”). 13 The parties explain that they have agreed to move this matter to arbitration after the Court’s ENE 14 and thus, even if the ENE does not resolve the claims, there is no pending fact question before the 15 Court. The parties add that they have agreed to exchange initial disclosures before the ENE. The 16 Court grants the parties’ stipulation because it finds a stay of discovery appropriate under the 17 good cause analysis in Schrader v. Wynn, No. 2:19-cv-02159-JCM-BNW,
2021 WL 4810324, at 18 *4 (D. Nev. Oct. 14, 2021) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 1. 19 20 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties’ joint motion to stay discovery (ECF 21 No. 17) is granted. 22 23 DATED: September 26, 2023 24 DANIEL J. ALBREGTS 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26
27 1 The parties title their motion a “joint motion” despite it being signed by all parties. See LR 7-
Reference
- Status
- Unknown