Nobriga v. Roadsafe Traffic Systems, Inc.

District Court, D. Nevada

Nobriga v. Roadsafe Traffic Systems, Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

1

2

3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 MARY NOBRIGA, Case No. 2:22-cv-01845-RFB-NJK

8 Plaintiff, ORDER

9 v. [Docket No. 21]

10 ROADSAFE TRAFFIC SYSTEMS, INC. 11 Defendant. 12 Pending before the Court is a stipulation to extend case management deadlines by 30 days. 13 Docket No. 21. 14 A request to extend unexpired deadlines in the scheduling order must be premised on a 15 showing of good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4); Local Rule 26-3. The good cause analysis turns 16 on whether the subject deadlines cannot reasonably be met despite the exercise of diligence. 17 Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.,

975 F.2d 604, 610

(9th Cir. 1992). The required showing 18 of diligence is measured by the conduct displayed throughout the entire period of time already 19 allowed. See, e.g., Muniz v. United Parcel Serv., Inc.,

731 F. Supp. 2d 961, 967

(N.D. Cal. 2010). 20 “When a request to extend case management deadlines is made by stipulation, courts may consider 21 the joint nature of the request in deciding whether the circumstances warrant an amendment to the 22 scheduling order. Nonetheless, courts addressing such requests are deciding at bottom whether to 23 modify their own orders, an issue that need not be based necessarily on the promptings of the 24 parties.” Williams v. James River Grp.,

627 F. Supp. 3d 1172

, 1178 (D. Nev. 2022). 25 The instant stipulation seeks the requested extension due to delays caused by Defense 26 counsel’s upcoming trial in an unrelated matter. See Docket No. 21 at 2-3. While the Court 27 28 1} cautions the parties that a busy schedule is not good cause for the extension sought, see Williams, 2|| 627 F. Supp. 3d at 1180, the Court finds that good cause exists to justify an extension of 30 days.! 3 Accordingly, the stipulation to extend case management deadlines is GRANTED. Deadlines are RESET as follows: 5 e Amend pleadings/ add parties: closed 6 e Initial experts: closed 7 e Rebuttal experts: closed 8 e Discovery cutoff: November 27, 2023 9 e Dispositive motions: December 27, 2023 10 e Joint proposed pretrial order: January 26, 2024, or 30 days after resolution of 11 dispositive motions 12 NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED. 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 Dated: October 5, 2023 Ge 15 ae x. Nancy J. Kopné 16 United States h agistrate Judge 7

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27), ——__________ ' The Court does not find good cause to extend the discovery deadlines to the extent that 28]| the parties wish to accommodate potential mediation and the holiday season.

Reference

Status
Unknown