Davis v. Cooke
Davis v. Cooke
Trial Court Opinion
11 MARGARET G. FOLEY NEVADA BAR NO. 7703 22 FOLEY LAW CENTER 33 601 S. RANCHO DRIVE, SUITE A-1 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89106 44 Telephone: (702) 569-2054 Facsimile: (702) 380-4035 55 [email protected] Pro Bono Attorney for Plaintiff Terrance Davis 66 77 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 9 10 10 11 CASE NO.: 3:22-cv-00473-ART-CLB 11 TERRANCE DAVIS, 12 12 Plaintiff, 11 33 v. O TOR D CE OR N G TIR NA UN ET EIN AG R LS YTI PULATION 14 14 MEDIATION CONFERENCE FOR 15 TASHEENA COOKE, Warden; CSS Caseworker THIRTY DAYS 15 DUGON; Correctional Officer NICKLES; 16 Correctional Officer ANDREW; and Correctional 16 Officer GARCIA 17 17 Defendants. 18 18 19 19 ________________________________________ 20 20 The parties to this matter, appearing through their respective counsel, Aaron D. Ford, 21 21 Nevada Attorney General, and Jessica E. Brown, Deputy Attorney General, of the State of 22 22 Nevada, Office of the Attorney General, counsel for Defendants and Interested Party Nevada 23 23 Department of Corrections, and Margaret G. Foley, Counsel for Plaintiff, hereby submit their 24 2245 stipulation and agreement to continue the Early Mediation Conference (“EMC”) currently 2256 scheduled for November 7, 2023, and respectfully request that the Court continue the Early 2267 1 11 Mediation Conference for thirty (30) days while the Parties continue to pursue settlement of this 22 matter. The Parties’ request is supported by good cause. 33 District courts have the inherent power to control their dockets. Thompson v. Hous. Auth. 44 of City of Los Angeles,
782 F.2d 829, 831(9th Cir. 1986). Good cause to continue the Early 55 Mediation Conference exists, as the Parties are continuing to discuss settlement of this case, 66 along with settlement of the three other cases in which Plaintiff is appearing pro se.1 The Parties 77 have made good progress towards a global settlement of the four cases and believe their 88 productive settlement dialogue will benefit from a continuance of the second session of the EMC 99 now scheduled for November 7, 2023. 11 00 The parties further agree to contact Ms. Ashlyn Bye for a new date for the second 11 11 session of the EMC to be scheduled on the Court’s calendar for thirty (30) days following 12 November 7, or as soon thereafter ass the continued EMC may be scheduled. 12 13 / / / 13 14 / / / 14 15 / / / 15 16 / / / 16 17 / / / 17 18 / / / 18 19 / / / 19 20 / / / 20 21 / / / 21 22 / / / 22 23 23 24 2245 1 The three other cases that are part of the EMC are Davis v. C/O Little et al., USDC 3:23-cv- 00033-RCJ-CLB; Davis v. Underwood et al., USDC 3:23-cv-00003-ART-CLB; and Davis v. 2256 Gonzalaz et al., USDC 3:22-cv-00188-RCJ-CLB. 2267 2 2 Based on the foregoing, the Parties submit that good cause exists to grant the requested 3 || continuance and that the EMC be continued for thirty (30) days from November 7, 2023. 5 || DATED this 23" day of October, 2023 DATED this 234 day of October, 2023 || AARON D. FORD 7 Attorney General g /S/ Jessica E. Brown /S/ Margaret G. Foley 9 JESSICA E. BROWN (Bar No. 14487) MARGARET G. FOLEY (Bar No. 7703) 555 E. Washington Avenue, Suite 3900 601 S. Rancho Dr., Ste. A-1 10 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Las Vegas, Nevada 89106 ll Attorneys for Defendant Attorney for Plaintiff 12 13 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED: * 16 17 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 18 19 DATED: October 24,2023 0 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 3:22-CV-00473-ART-CLB
Reference
- Status
- Unknown