1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3 Case No.: 2:23-cv-00322-JAD-EJY 4 Antonio Corrillo Estrella,

5 Plaintiff Order Adopting Report & Recommendation 6 and Dismissing Action v. 7 Ricardo Ramirez, et al., 8 [ECF No. 15]

9 Defendants 10 11 On June 5, 2023, the court recommended that plaintiff Antonio Corrillo Estrella’s claim 12 be dismissed with leave to file an amended complaint by July 18th.1 The copy of that order 13 mailed to Estrella was returned as undeliverable.2 So on June 6th, the magistrate judge ordered 14 for Estrella to update his address by July 7th.3 Estrella was warned that his failure to update his 15 address by that deadline would result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed.4 16 When Estrella did not update his address and filed nothing by July 18th, the magistrate 17 judge entered a report and recommendation that this case be dismissed for failure to comply with 18 court orders.5 Estrella had 14 days after being served with the report and recommendation to 19 object, and he neither filed objections nor moved to extend the deadline to do so. “[N]o review 20 21 22 23 24 1 ECF No. 10. 25 2 ECF No. 11. I accepted the recommendation to dismiss the case with leave to amend on June 30th, and that order was returned as undeliverable, too. ECF No. 14. 26 3 ECF No. 12. 27 4 Id. 28 5 ECF No. 15. 1 || is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.””® 2 || Having reviewed the R&R, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do. 3 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [ECF No. 15] is ADOPTED in its entirety. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice, and 5 || the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. 6 7 veomf hoes, A. Dorse 8 October 24, 202 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 | | 27116 Schmidt v. Johnstone,

(D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474

, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003).