Nasby v. Wickham
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 ke 4 BRENDAN NASBY, Case No. 3:22-CV-00146-MMD-CLB 5 Plaintiff, ORDER TO FILE OPPOSITION TO 6 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HAROLD WICKHAM, et al., ° Defendants.
10 On September 5, 2023, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF | No. 26.) Plaintiff was given notice of the motion pursuant to the requirements of Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9" Cir. 1988), and Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9"" Cir. | 1998) (ECF No. 27). Originally, Plaintiffs response to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was due on September 26, 2023. However, the Court granted Plaintiff's motion | for extension of time to file the opposition for an additional thirty days, moving the deadline 16] to October 26, 2023. (ECF No. 30.) To date, Plaintiff has failed to file an opposition.
17 The Court will sua sponte grant Plaintiff one final extension of time to Monday, | November 13, 2023, to file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment. No further 19 extensions of time shall be granted. If Plaintiff fails to file an opposition, the motion will be submitted to the Court for decision.
21 IT IS SO ORDERED.
22| DATED: October 30, 2023. .
24 UNITED STATES\MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.